[Java][C] sliced RecordBatch offset info is lost when imported from c-data

### Describe the bug, including details regarding any error messages, version, and platform.

Reproduced on latest arrow release (16.0)

When importing a sliced RecordBatch from c to java

On c side:
```
auto sliced_record_batch = original_record_batch->Slice(/*offset=*/8, /*length=*/2);
arrow::ExportRecordBatch(sliced_record_batch, arrow_array_ptr);
```

On java side:
```
ArrowArray arrowArray = ArrowArray.allocateNew(allocator);
Data.importIntoVectorSchemaRoot(allocator, arrowArray, vectorSchemaRoot, null);
```

The imported vectorSchemaRoot maintains the correct length(which is 2), but the offset info (which is 8) is not respected, hence the content of the imported vectorSchemaRoot points to the first 2 rows of the original_record_batch, while the desired content is sliced_record_batch.

I'm not familiar with arrow code, but it seems that the offset info is actually present in org.apache.arrow.c.ArrowArray.Snapshot, but org.apache.arrow.c.ArrayImporter ignores the offset in org.apache.arrow.c.ArrayImporter.doImport(ArrowArray.Snapshot)

### Component(s)

Java

Beginne mit dem Lesen von org.apache.arrow.c.ArrayImporter.doImport(ArrowArray.Snapshot) und der Offset-Information in org.apache.arrow.c.ArrowArray.Snapshot. Reproduziere den Java-Import mit dem auf C-Seite geslicten RecordBatch und überprüfe anschließend, dass vectorSchemaRoot die Zeilen ab dem Slice-Offset und nicht die ersten Zeilen des ursprünglichen Batches enthält.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.