Worth automating the messages.properties translation sync?
- 主要言語
- Java
- スター
- 5.1k
- フォーク
- 835
- PR マージ指標
- 30日以内にマージされた PR はありません
説明
I cloned `master` and counted how complete each translation is against `messages.properties` (329 keys, 17 languages). Turkish is the most complete at 90%, but a lot are well behind — Estonian 6%, Japanese 21%, Lithuanian 43%, Russian 57% — and German and Spanish sit around 78%. The app already ships `preferences.language.someIncomplete` for exactly this, so it's a known thing.
Since translations come in as hand-written PRs, the older languages drift as English strings change and mostly don't catch back up.
I maintain Bisq's localization tooling ([localize-pipeline](https://github.com/bisq-network/localize-pipeline)) and could set up a workflow that translates the changed keys and opens a PR to review. It stays off until someone adds a model key, never merges by itself, keeps the `{0}` placeholders intact, and can run against a local model if you'd rather keep strings local.
Before I put up a PR: is this worth having here? If AI-drafted translations are a no for you, that's fine — just say so and I'll leave it.
cc @angryziber
コントリビューションガイド
このリポジトリのコントリビューションガイドは索引されていません
評価
この issue はまだ評価されていません。