angryip / angryip/ipscan

Worth automating the messages.properties translation sync?

Ouverte
#524 0 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub
feature-request
Langage dominant
Java
Étoiles
5.1k
Forks
835
Métriques de merge des PR
Aucune PR mergée en 30 j

Description

I cloned `master` and counted how complete each translation is against `messages.properties` (329 keys, 17 languages). Turkish is the most complete at 90%, but a lot are well behind — Estonian 6%, Japanese 21%, Lithuanian 43%, Russian 57% — and German and Spanish sit around 78%. The app already ships `preferences.language.someIncomplete` for exactly this, so it's a known thing.

Since translations come in as hand-written PRs, the older languages drift as English strings change and mostly don't catch back up.

I maintain Bisq's localization tooling ([localize-pipeline](https://github.com/bisq-network/localize-pipeline)) and could set up a workflow that translates the changed keys and opens a PR to review. It stays off until someone adds a model key, never merges by itself, keeps the `{0}` placeholders intact, and can run against a local model if you'd rather keep strings local.

Before I put up a PR: is this worth having here? If AI-drafted translations are a no for you, that's fine — just say so and I'll leave it.

cc @angryziber

Guide de contribution

Aucun guide de contribution indexé pour ce dépôt

Évaluation

Cette issue n'a pas encore été évaluée.

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.