angryip / angryip/ipscan

Worth automating the messages.properties translation sync?

Aperta
#524 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub
feature-request
Lingua principale
Java
Stelle
5.1k
Fork
835
Metriche di merge delle PR
Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g

Descrizione

I cloned `master` and counted how complete each translation is against `messages.properties` (329 keys, 17 languages). Turkish is the most complete at 90%, but a lot are well behind — Estonian 6%, Japanese 21%, Lithuanian 43%, Russian 57% — and German and Spanish sit around 78%. The app already ships `preferences.language.someIncomplete` for exactly this, so it's a known thing.

Since translations come in as hand-written PRs, the older languages drift as English strings change and mostly don't catch back up.

I maintain Bisq's localization tooling ([localize-pipeline](https://github.com/bisq-network/localize-pipeline)) and could set up a workflow that translates the changed keys and opens a PR to review. It stays off until someone adds a model key, never merges by itself, keeps the `{0}` placeholders intact, and can run against a local model if you'd rather keep strings local.

Before I put up a PR: is this worth having here? If AI-drafted translations are a no for you, that's fine — just say so and I'll leave it.

cc @angryziber

Guida per i contributori

Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository

Valutazione

Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.