allenai / allenai/olmes

Reproduction of Tulu-3-8B-SFT on MMLU

Aperta
#27 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub
Lingua principale
Python
Stelle
395
Fork
105
Metriche di merge delle PR
Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g

Descrizione

Hi, thanks for great tool for reproducing evaluation of Ai2 models!

I ran the olmes eval with:
```
olmes \
--model allenai/Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-SFT \
--model-type vllm \
--model-args '{"gpu_memory_utilization": 0.8, "max_length": 4096}' \
--task tulu_3_dev \
--output-dir out \
--batch-size auto
```
and I was able to reproduce most of the benchmarks with <1% difference from the results reported in the [Tulu3 paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.15124). However, on MMLU I have a discrepancy of 4% which is concerning. See the table below where for reproduction I report `primary_score` for all of the tasks (expect of MATH where I consider `exact_match_flex_macro`).

| Benchmark | Tülu 3 SFT | Reproduction |
|----------------------------|------------|--------------|
| MMLU (0 shot, CoT) | **65.9** | **62.0** |
| PopQA (15 shot) | 29.3 | 29.5 |
| TruthfulQA (6 shot) | 46.8 | 46.8 |
| BigBenchHard (3 shot, CoT) | 69.7 | 69.6 |
| DROP (3 shot) | 61.3 | 61.2 |
| MATH (4 shot CoT, Flex) | 31.5 | 31.0 |
| GSM8K (8 shot, CoT) | 76.2 | 76.1 |
| HumanEval (pass@10) | 86.2 | 87.3 |
| HumanEval+ (pass@10) | 81.4 | 80.7 |
| IFEval (prompt loose) | 72.8 | 72.6 |

Do you know what may be a source of such difference in results? Thanks in advance

Guida per i contributori

Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository

Valutazione

Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.