allenai / allenai/olmes

Reproduction of Tulu-3-8B-SFT on MMLU

Offen
#27 0 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen
Vorherrschende Sprache
Python
Sterne
395
Forks
105
PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.

Beschreibung

Hi, thanks for great tool for reproducing evaluation of Ai2 models!

I ran the olmes eval with:
```
olmes \
--model allenai/Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-SFT \
--model-type vllm \
--model-args '{"gpu_memory_utilization": 0.8, "max_length": 4096}' \
--task tulu_3_dev \
--output-dir out \
--batch-size auto
```
and I was able to reproduce most of the benchmarks with <1% difference from the results reported in the [Tulu3 paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.15124). However, on MMLU I have a discrepancy of 4% which is concerning. See the table below where for reproduction I report `primary_score` for all of the tasks (expect of MATH where I consider `exact_match_flex_macro`).

| Benchmark | Tülu 3 SFT | Reproduction |
|----------------------------|------------|--------------|
| MMLU (0 shot, CoT) | **65.9** | **62.0** |
| PopQA (15 shot) | 29.3 | 29.5 |
| TruthfulQA (6 shot) | 46.8 | 46.8 |
| BigBenchHard (3 shot, CoT) | 69.7 | 69.6 |
| DROP (3 shot) | 61.3 | 61.2 |
| MATH (4 shot CoT, Flex) | 31.5 | 31.0 |
| GSM8K (8 shot, CoT) | 76.2 | 76.1 |
| HumanEval (pass@10) | 86.2 | 87.3 |
| HumanEval+ (pass@10) | 81.4 | 80.7 |
| IFEval (prompt loose) | 72.8 | 72.6 |

Do you know what may be a source of such difference in results? Thanks in advance

Beitragsleitfaden

Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert

Bewertung

Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.