allenai / allenai/olmes

Reproduction of Tulu-3-8B-SFT on MMLU

Abierto
#27 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub
Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
395
Forks
105
Métricas de merge de PR
Sin PR fusionados en 30 d

Descripción

Hi, thanks for great tool for reproducing evaluation of Ai2 models!

I ran the olmes eval with:
```
olmes \
--model allenai/Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-SFT \
--model-type vllm \
--model-args '{"gpu_memory_utilization": 0.8, "max_length": 4096}' \
--task tulu_3_dev \
--output-dir out \
--batch-size auto
```
and I was able to reproduce most of the benchmarks with <1% difference from the results reported in the [Tulu3 paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.15124). However, on MMLU I have a discrepancy of 4% which is concerning. See the table below where for reproduction I report `primary_score` for all of the tasks (expect of MATH where I consider `exact_match_flex_macro`).

| Benchmark | Tülu 3 SFT | Reproduction |
|----------------------------|------------|--------------|
| MMLU (0 shot, CoT) | **65.9** | **62.0** |
| PopQA (15 shot) | 29.3 | 29.5 |
| TruthfulQA (6 shot) | 46.8 | 46.8 |
| BigBenchHard (3 shot, CoT) | 69.7 | 69.6 |
| DROP (3 shot) | 61.3 | 61.2 |
| MATH (4 shot CoT, Flex) | 31.5 | 31.0 |
| GSM8K (8 shot, CoT) | 76.2 | 76.1 |
| HumanEval (pass@10) | 86.2 | 87.3 |
| HumanEval+ (pass@10) | 81.4 | 80.7 |
| IFEval (prompt loose) | 72.8 | 72.6 |

Do you know what may be a source of such difference in results? Thanks in advance

Guía de contribución

No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio

Evaluación

Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.