Isn't section 5.1 "Use object destructuring" conflicting with 3.3 "Use object method shorthand" ?

In section 5.1 it is stated the following:

> Use object destructuring when accessing and using multiple properties of an object.

In section 3.3, it is stated the following:

> Use object method shorthand.

Let's look at the following example:

```js
const foo = {
bar: 5,
// applying 3.3
computeSomething() {
return this.bar + 5;
}
};

// applying 5.1
const {bar, computeSomething} = foo;

console.log(bar);

computeSomething();
```

The last instruction throws the following error:

> TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'bar')

So, applying both 3.3 and 5.1 can lead to an incorrect code. Either we have to use arrow functions in objects definition; or we have to not use destructuring; but both 3.3 and 5.1 can't be recommended together without creating potential issues. At least, that's what I'm feeling.

What do you think? Did I miss the point or a clarification in the specs about that?

スタイルガイドのセクション3.3と5.1を読み、その後、issueにあるobject-methodとdestructuringの例を再現してください。コメントの議論を確認して合意された解釈を把握し、ガイダンスが適用される場合を示す例を添えて、明確で矛盾のない推奨事項を文書化してください。2つのセクションが安全でない組み合わせた使用を示唆しなくなれば完了です。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。