adobe-fonts / adobe-fonts/source-han-sans

U+2E3A is too thin for bolder fonts, should be as thick as U+2014

未關閉
#367 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視
design
主要語言
Python
星號
17.2k
分支
1.4k
PR 合併指標
30 天內沒有已合併 PR

描述

Environment: archlinux+texlive2022
Compile: Tried both xelatex and lualatex
MWE:
```
\documentclass[fontset=none]{ctexart}
\setCJKmainfont{Noto Sans CJK SC}[RawFeature=+fwid]

\begin{document}
a \symbol{"2E3A} a
\end{document}
```

You can change `Noto Sans CJK SC` to `Noto Sans CJK SC Bold` or `Noto Sans CJK SC Light`, and it turns out that the thickness of the dash `\symbol{"2E3A}` has **barely changed**

Bold:
![Screenshot_20221229_165448](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/65082432/209927569-1162f601-bd7c-4b0a-a442-171a578a907e.png)

Light:
![Screenshot_20221229_165513](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/65082432/209927633-748e3dbe-a913-4b31-83d6-6e5d271965e3.png)

As long as `[RawFeature=+fwid]` is turned on, it will be like this, whether you use `——` or `\symbol{"2E3A}`, you can compare it with when `[RawFeature=+fwid]` is not turned on, the thickness of the Chinese dash is obviously different from that of em dash in Western which follows the thickness growth.

**This will cause the dashes to appear very thin when in regular/medium/bold/black, which doesn't match the text very well**

貢獻指南

這個儲存庫沒有索引到貢獻指南

評估

這個 Issue 還沒有評估資料。

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。