adobe-fonts / adobe-fonts/source-han-sans

U+2E3A is too thin for bolder fonts, should be as thick as U+2014

Offen
#367 0 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen
design
Vorherrschende Sprache
Python
Sterne
17.2k
Forks
1.4k
PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.

Beschreibung

Environment: archlinux+texlive2022
Compile: Tried both xelatex and lualatex
MWE:
```
\documentclass[fontset=none]{ctexart}
\setCJKmainfont{Noto Sans CJK SC}[RawFeature=+fwid]

\begin{document}
a \symbol{"2E3A} a
\end{document}
```

You can change `Noto Sans CJK SC` to `Noto Sans CJK SC Bold` or `Noto Sans CJK SC Light`, and it turns out that the thickness of the dash `\symbol{"2E3A}` has **barely changed**

Bold:
![Screenshot_20221229_165448](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/65082432/209927569-1162f601-bd7c-4b0a-a442-171a578a907e.png)

Light:
![Screenshot_20221229_165513](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/65082432/209927633-748e3dbe-a913-4b31-83d6-6e5d271965e3.png)

As long as `[RawFeature=+fwid]` is turned on, it will be like this, whether you use `——` or `\symbol{"2E3A}`, you can compare it with when `[RawFeature=+fwid]` is not turned on, the thickness of the Chinese dash is obviously different from that of em dash in Western which follows the thickness growth.

**This will cause the dashes to appear very thin when in regular/medium/bold/black, which doesn't match the text very well**

Beitragsleitfaden

Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert

Bewertung

Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.