adobe-fonts / adobe-fonts/source-han-sans

U+2E3A is too thin for bolder fonts, should be as thick as U+2014

Abierto
#367 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub
design
Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
17.2k
Forks
1.4k
Métricas de merge de PR
Sin PR fusionados en 30 d

Descripción

Environment: archlinux+texlive2022
Compile: Tried both xelatex and lualatex
MWE:
```
\documentclass[fontset=none]{ctexart}
\setCJKmainfont{Noto Sans CJK SC}[RawFeature=+fwid]

\begin{document}
a \symbol{"2E3A} a
\end{document}
```

You can change `Noto Sans CJK SC` to `Noto Sans CJK SC Bold` or `Noto Sans CJK SC Light`, and it turns out that the thickness of the dash `\symbol{"2E3A}` has **barely changed**

Bold:
![Screenshot_20221229_165448](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/65082432/209927569-1162f601-bd7c-4b0a-a442-171a578a907e.png)

Light:
![Screenshot_20221229_165513](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/65082432/209927633-748e3dbe-a913-4b31-83d6-6e5d271965e3.png)

As long as `[RawFeature=+fwid]` is turned on, it will be like this, whether you use `——` or `\symbol{"2E3A}`, you can compare it with when `[RawFeature=+fwid]` is not turned on, the thickness of the Chinese dash is obviously different from that of em dash in Western which follows the thickness growth.

**This will cause the dashes to appear very thin when in regular/medium/bold/black, which doesn't match the text very well**

Guía de contribución

No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio

Evaluación

Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.