RoboStack / RoboStack/robostack.github.io
Investigation: Using `pixi-build-ros` with `pixi` instead of `vinca` with `rattler-build`.
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Astro
- Sterne
- 385
- Forks
- 36
- Ø Merge
- 5 Std. 37 Min.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 18
Beschreibung
Leaving this here as an intermediate result of some investigation into the topic of using pixi-build-ros instead of vinca to generate the recipes and build the packages for the ROS distros in RoboStack.
Issues found:
pixidoesn't automatically use all dependencies in the workspace as host/build dependencies of the other packages in the workspace so it's not easy to setup a workspace that contains all packages from a git source. (https://github.com/prefix-dev/pixi/issues/6901)pixi-build-rosdoesn't support the concept ofpatchesyet. (https://github.com/prefix-dev/pixi/issues/6918)
We could support this by adding the copy of source into a source folder again like the backends used to do.- You would still need some script to manage the distro snapshots as a way to fill in the
[package.build.source]for pixi build. - There needs to be a build orchestrator like
vinca-ghato create the multi stage GitHub Actions workflow file.
This would be a feature that is welcome to Pixi anyway as it would be really cool to have any type of workspace split it's builds into multiple jobs, on any CI server.
Smaller issues:
pixi-build-rosneeds to support<group_depend>from apackage.xml.pixi-build-rosneeds to supportros2-<package_name>naming convention.- We need a backend for dummy meta packages where we need to shim conda-forge packages like
ros-xxx-eigenpy.
Claude generated sketch, not perfect but sketches the idea of this comparison.
I feel like this would only align the tools more but wouldn't bring too many UX improvements to RoboStack today. As you would still need to maintain a generator to translate the rosdistro_snapshot into pixi.toml files instead of recipe.yaml files. The robostack.yaml would still need to be maintained.
Where I can see value is in making pixi-build-ros a better tool for ROS development. The required CI job orchestration tool would be a big win for Pixi and the work to maintain vinca can be moved to pixi-build-ros to share more of the effort between the projects.
Beitragsleitfaden
Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Beginne mit pixi-build-ros und den verknüpften Pixi-Issues #6901 und #6918 und überprüfe anschließend die aufgeführten Lücken in Bezug auf Patches, Distro-Snapshots, Workflow-Orchestrierung und ROS-Paketmetadaten. Als abgeschlossen gilt die Arbeit, wenn der Umfang festgelegt und eine konkrete Nachverfolgung für die ausgewählten Verbesserungen definiert wurde; dieses Issue nennt keine Dateien oder Tests.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- github-actions
- Bereich
- build-system, ci-cd, tooling
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Aktiv
- Klarheit
- Muss geklärt werden
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 30/100