PowerShell / PowerShell/PSScriptAnalyzer
Internal: Build/Release inconsistencies compared to PowerShell Core repo
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
- Langage dominant
- C#
- Étoiles
- 2.2k
- Forks
- 414
- Merge moyen
- 13 h 1 min
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 2
Description
@JamesWTruher is planning to do some work for making the development/CI more consistent across PowerShell repos. I'll start here listing some potential candidates:
- Pester: PsCore recently moved from version 3 to 4. PSSA is currently on version 3.4
- Visual Studio Support: I already added support for being able to build and debug PSSA using Visual Studio out of the box. PsCore has a pending PR (5209) to achieve that.
- Editing ressources: When moving to Visual Studio development and netcore2, PSSA dropped the ability to auto-generate the c# ressource class because VS does that automatically when editing ressources. People who are not on Visual Studio, currently need to add new properties to the ressouce class file manually when adding new ressource entries. A further downside is that it unnecessarily blows up the diff in a PR can potentiall lead to merge conflicts. I originally did this due to difficulties when upgrading but I will consider bringing this functionality back
- PSSA gets its version number bumped only just before the release. PSCore does it straight after the release (branch) has been created. This makes it difficult when developing or reproing bugs because it means that the installed version has to be installed/uninstalled unnecessarily often.
- Make it easier to run all tests locally by moving out some logic from the appveyor fle into a ps module
- PSSA uses a GitFlow like branching strategy where PRs target the
developmentbranch. PSCore only works on master/release branches, which seems to be the better model for smaller repos. - PSSA has too many build scripts:
build.cmd,build.ps1,.build.ps1andbuildCoreClr.ps1
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Piste de recherche
Commencez par examiner les éléments non cochés de l’issue et les fichiers de build indiqués : build.cmd, build.ps1, .build.ps1, buildCoreClr.ps1 et la configuration AppVeyor. Suivez la manière dont les classes de ressources, la gestion des versions et le comportement du CI local sont actuellement gérés. Le travail est terminé lorsque les améliorations de cohérence sélectionnées sont implémentées et que leur comportement de build ou de release est vérifié.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- csharp, powershell
- Domaine
- build-system, ci-cd, release
- Type d'issue
- Refactorisation
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 3-5 jours
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- À clarifier
- Accessibilité débutants
- 25/100