PowerShell / PowerShell/PSScriptAnalyzer
Internal: Build/Release inconsistencies compared to PowerShell Core repo
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- C#
- Estrellas
- 2.2k
- Forks
- 414
- Merge medio
- 13 h 1 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 2
Descripción
@JamesWTruher is planning to do some work for making the development/CI more consistent across PowerShell repos. I'll start here listing some potential candidates:
- Pester: PsCore recently moved from version 3 to 4. PSSA is currently on version 3.4
- Visual Studio Support: I already added support for being able to build and debug PSSA using Visual Studio out of the box. PsCore has a pending PR (5209) to achieve that.
- Editing ressources: When moving to Visual Studio development and netcore2, PSSA dropped the ability to auto-generate the c# ressource class because VS does that automatically when editing ressources. People who are not on Visual Studio, currently need to add new properties to the ressouce class file manually when adding new ressource entries. A further downside is that it unnecessarily blows up the diff in a PR can potentiall lead to merge conflicts. I originally did this due to difficulties when upgrading but I will consider bringing this functionality back
- PSSA gets its version number bumped only just before the release. PSCore does it straight after the release (branch) has been created. This makes it difficult when developing or reproing bugs because it means that the installed version has to be installed/uninstalled unnecessarily often.
- Make it easier to run all tests locally by moving out some logic from the appveyor fle into a ps module
- PSSA uses a GitFlow like branching strategy where PRs target the
developmentbranch. PSCore only works on master/release branches, which seems to be the better model for smaller repos. - PSSA has too many build scripts:
build.cmd,build.ps1,.build.ps1andbuildCoreClr.ps1
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Comienza revisando los elementos no marcados del issue y los archivos de build indicados: build.cmd, build.ps1, .build.ps1, buildCoreClr.ps1 y la configuración de AppVeyor. Sigue cómo se gestionan actualmente las clases de recursos, el versionado y el comportamiento de CI local. Se considera terminado cuando se hayan implementado las mejoras de consistencia seleccionadas y se haya verificado su comportamiento de build o release.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- csharp, powershell
- Área
- build-system, ci-cd, release
- Tipo de issue
- Refactorización
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100