InnerSourceCommons / InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns

[Pattern Idea] Maintainer Apprentice

Aberta
#670 4 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

:book: Type - Content Work :bulb: Early Idea 1-initial
Linguagem predominante
HTML
Estrelas
853
Forks
206
Merge médio
1d 23h
PRs com merge (30d)
2

Descrição

Title

Maintainer Apprentice

Patlet / Summary

A user wants to work their way into becoming an Approver/Maintainer on an InnerSource repository while being given enough permissions to prove their contributions.

Problem

Sometimes a repository may want to "onboard" maintainers without giving them full write access. This means they are added to a repository to provide content/changes and able to "approve" other changes but not merge them. This could be a form of onboarding or internship on the way to approver or maintainer roles.

Context

From @spier in #669

...our idea with the lower section of the CODEOWNERS file was, that those folks doing the translation work might sort of be "maintainer apprentice", and through their involvement in the project become maintainers eventually

In this particular situation the user was in the CODEOWNERS file but did not have write permissions on the repository. This caused GitHub to label the CODEOWNERS file as having errors.

image

Forces

What could make this problem difficult?

  • the permissions structure in the organization or repository is not present to solve this

Tradeoff(s):

  • Knowing a "maintainer apprentice" is given enough permissions to contribute and approve but not merge changes.

Solutions

Any of the following:

  • Make sure all reviewers/approvers/maintainers of repositories have write permissions
  • Accepting that not all reviewers/approvers/maintainers of repositories have write permissions until earned
  • Custom repository or organization roles (if the software allows it) (e.g, Custom Repository Roles)

Resulting Context

What is the situation after the problem has been solved?
The original context is changed indirectly by way of the solution.
Often this section can include discussion of the next possible Patterns/problems introduced.
This section can be short in content - the solution may not introduce new problems or change much context.

Known Instances (optional)

#669

Status

Initial

Author(s) (optional)

@spier
@jmeridth

Guia de contribuição

Abrir o guia de contribuição

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Direção de pesquisa

Comece pelo issue #670 e pela instância conhecida vinculada #669; em seguida, revise o contexto de CODEOWNERS e das funções personalizadas do repositório descrito no issue. Um padrão completo deve resolver a seção inacabada Resulting Context e documentar claramente o problema entre maintainer e apprentice, os trade-offs, as soluções e o resultado.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Avaliação

Stack de tecnologia
github, markdown
Domínio
documentation
Tipo de issue
Documentação
Dificuldade
5/5
Tempo estimado
Mais de uma semana
Status de atividade
Estagnada
Clareza
Precisa de esclarecimento
Facilidade para iniciantes
25/100

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.