InnerSourceCommons / InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns
[Pattern Idea] Maintainer Apprentice
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
- Langage dominant
- HTML
- Étoiles
- 853
- Forks
- 206
- Merge moyen
- 1 j 23 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 2
Description
Title
Maintainer Apprentice
Patlet / Summary
A user wants to work their way into becoming an Approver/Maintainer on an InnerSource repository while being given enough permissions to prove their contributions.
Problem
Sometimes a repository may want to "onboard" maintainers without giving them full write access. This means they are added to a repository to provide content/changes and able to "approve" other changes but not merge them. This could be a form of onboarding or internship on the way to approver or maintainer roles.
Context
From @spier in #669
...our idea with the lower section of the CODEOWNERS file was, that those folks doing the translation work might sort of be "maintainer apprentice", and through their involvement in the project become maintainers eventually
In this particular situation the user was in the CODEOWNERS file but did not have write permissions on the repository. This caused GitHub to label the CODEOWNERS file as having errors.
Forces
What could make this problem difficult?
- the permissions structure in the organization or repository is not present to solve this
Tradeoff(s):
- Knowing a "maintainer apprentice" is given enough permissions to contribute and approve but not merge changes.
Solutions
Any of the following:
- Make sure all reviewers/approvers/maintainers of repositories have write permissions
- Accepting that not all reviewers/approvers/maintainers of repositories have write permissions until earned
- Custom repository or organization roles (if the software allows it) (e.g, Custom Repository Roles)
Resulting Context
What is the situation after the problem has been solved?
The original context is changed indirectly by way of the solution.
Often this section can include discussion of the next possible Patterns/problems introduced.
This section can be short in content - the solution may not introduce new problems or change much context.
Known Instances (optional)
#669
Status
Initial
Author(s) (optional)
@spier
@jmeridth
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Piste de recherche
Commencez par l’issue #670 et l’instance connue liée #669, puis examinez le contexte de CODEOWNERS et des rôles de dépôt personnalisés décrit dans l’issue. Un modèle complet devrait finaliser la section inachevée Resulting Context et documenter clairement le problème maintainer-apprentice, les compromis, les solutions et le résultat.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- github, markdown
- Domaine
- documentation
- Type d'issue
- Documentation
- Difficulté
- 5/5
- Temps estimé
- Plus d'une semaine
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- À clarifier
- Accessibilité débutants
- 25/100