Investigate if rewriting to `cumulatives` is good for zero-length tasks when posting MiniZinc constraints `gecode_cumulatives`
オープン
good first issue
help wanted
- 主要言語
- C++
- スター
- 335
- フォーク
- 88
- 平均マージ
- 1時間 28分
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 1
説明
In the [registry function](https://github.com/Gecode/gecode/blob/87a464b9d7d67616c1b4c6b98600d38a782d014b/gecode/flatzinc/registry.cpp#L1210) for `gecode_cumulatives` the case where the tasks may have zero-length duration and the bound is not assigned is currently decomposed into basic constraints.
An alternative re-write strategy would be to rewrite to cumulatives using multiple machines, where zero-length tasks are on a different machine with an "unlimited" bound.
If #81 has been implemented, this should be tested in the new MiniZinc rewriting, otherwise in the current C++ code.
コントリビューションガイド
このリポジトリのコントリビューションガイドは索引されていません
評価
この issue はまだ評価されていません。