Investigate if rewriting to `cumulatives` is good for zero-length tasks when posting MiniZinc constraints `gecode_cumulatives`
Ouverte
good first issue
help wanted
- Langage dominant
- C++
- Étoiles
- 335
- Forks
- 88
- Merge moyen
- 1 h 28 min
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 1
Description
In the [registry function](https://github.com/Gecode/gecode/blob/87a464b9d7d67616c1b4c6b98600d38a782d014b/gecode/flatzinc/registry.cpp#L1210) for `gecode_cumulatives` the case where the tasks may have zero-length duration and the bound is not assigned is currently decomposed into basic constraints.
An alternative re-write strategy would be to rewrite to cumulatives using multiple machines, where zero-length tasks are on a different machine with an "unlimited" bound.
If #81 has been implemented, this should be tested in the new MiniZinc rewriting, otherwise in the current C++ code.
Guide de contribution
Aucun guide de contribution indexé pour ce dépôt
Évaluation
Cette issue n'a pas encore été évaluée.