Gecode / Gecode/gecode

Investigate if rewriting to `cumulatives` is good for zero-length tasks when posting MiniZinc constraints `gecode_cumulatives`

Ouverte
#82 0 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub
good first issue help wanted
Langage dominant
C++
Étoiles
335
Forks
88
Merge moyen
1 h 28 min
PR mergées (30 j)
1

Description

In the [registry function](https://github.com/Gecode/gecode/blob/87a464b9d7d67616c1b4c6b98600d38a782d014b/gecode/flatzinc/registry.cpp#L1210) for `gecode_cumulatives` the case where the tasks may have zero-length duration and the bound is not assigned is currently decomposed into basic constraints.

An alternative re-write strategy would be to rewrite to cumulatives using multiple machines, where zero-length tasks are on a different machine with an "unlimited" bound.

If #81 has been implemented, this should be tested in the new MiniZinc rewriting, otherwise in the current C++ code.

Guide de contribution

Aucun guide de contribution indexé pour ce dépôt

Évaluation

Cette issue n'a pas encore été évaluée.

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.