Codeception / Codeception/YiiBridge

[Q] What's the difference between running traditional tests and using the Yii module?

Abierto
#4 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub
Lenguaje dominante
PHP
Estrellas
21
Forks
18
Métricas de merge de PR
Sin PR fusionados en 30 d

Descripción

I'm new to functional testing and got confused when reading about the Yii module documentation.
What's the difference between running tests using the module and not using?

I thought at first that the tests would load the page and work on them as a user would (externally), instead of dealing with the page inside the test's code - what would trigger issues with `header` and `exit` calls as stated.

I guess running the tests that way would be more resource intensive and slow? Is it that bad the way we currently have to test Yii apps?

Would there be a way to integrate the tests generated by the framework with Codeception instead?

Guía de contribución

No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio

Línea de trabajo

Start by reading the Yii module documentation and comparing it with the traditional Yii functional-testing approach described in the issue. A useful outcome would clearly explain the difference, the implications of header and exit calls, and whether integrating framework-generated tests with Codeception is feasible.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Evaluación

Stack tecnológico
php
Área
testing
Tipo de issue
Documentación
Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Estado de actividad
Estancado
Claridad
Necesita aclaración
Aptitud para principiantes
20/100

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.