Codeception / Codeception/YiiBridge
[Q] What's the difference between running traditional tests and using the Yii module?
- Lenguaje dominante
- PHP
- Estrellas
- 21
- Forks
- 18
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Descripción
I'm new to functional testing and got confused when reading about the Yii module documentation.
What's the difference between running tests using the module and not using?
I thought at first that the tests would load the page and work on them as a user would (externally), instead of dealing with the page inside the test's code - what would trigger issues with `header` and `exit` calls as stated.
I guess running the tests that way would be more resource intensive and slow? Is it that bad the way we currently have to test Yii apps?
Would there be a way to integrate the tests generated by the framework with Codeception instead?
Guía de contribución
No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio
Línea de trabajo
Start by reading the Yii module documentation and comparing it with the traditional Yii functional-testing approach described in the issue. A useful outcome would clearly explain the difference, the implications of header and exit calls, and whether integrating framework-generated tests with Codeception is feasible.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- php
- Área
- testing
- Tipo de issue
- Documentación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 20/100