License clarification: which license governs CodeEditLanguages?

Hi, and thanks for maintaining CodeEditLanguages — bundling the tree-sitter grammars into a single precompiled xcframework is a genuinely clean way to consume tree-sitter on macOS.

I'd like to depend on this package in a commercial macOS app and want to attribute it correctly, but I can't determine the license for **this specific package**: there's no `LICENSE` file in the repo root, and GitHub's license API returns nothing for it. The main CodeEdit app is MIT, but `CodeEditLanguages` doesn't appear to carry its own license file.

Could you help clarify:

1. **What license governs `CodeEditLanguages` itself?** Is it intended to be MIT, consistent with the rest of the CodeEdit org? If so, would you consider adding a `LICENSE` file to the repo root so it's unambiguous and detectable by tooling (GitHub, SPM, license scanners)?

2. **Attribution for the bundled grammars** — each upstream tree-sitter grammar carries its own license (MIT/Apache-2.0/etc.). Is there an aggregate `NOTICE`/attribution you'd recommend bundling, or should consumers attribute each grammar from its upstream repo?

Happy to open a PR adding a `LICENSE` file (and a grammar `NOTICE`, if useful) if that would save you time. Thanks again!

Start by checking the repository root for the missing LICENSE file and reviewing how the bundled tree-sitter grammars and their upstream licenses are identified. Confirm the package’s governing license and the needed grammar attribution with maintainers; done means the repository contains the agreed LICENSE and, if needed, a NOTICE or documented attribution guidance.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。