BlockchainCommons / BlockchainCommons/keytool-cli

--cosigner option?

Aperta
#14 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub
Lingua principale
C++
Stelle
6
Fork
5
Metriche di merge delle PR
Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g

Descrizione

Related to #12 & #13 & to LetheKit:

I think one of the most common uses for us (Blockchain Commons) is to get the 48h/0h/0h/2h cosigner derivation into the short text & a UR QR form (with the optional label and birthday), suitable for offering or receiving as part of a Policy Map -> Account Map process. Thus could maybe be a --cosigner shortcut option for keytool.

Currently I don't think we can use `crypto-account` for this, so we need to puzzle that through.

Note that this does not solve the problem of cosigner reuse: later we figure out a good way to have different cosigners for different Account Maps we'll need to puzzle that through as well. But a simple `--cosigner` option will help a lot.

Related, we may want to explicitly add this 48h/0h/0h/2h cosigner UR to LetheKit, as it long-term may be the most common export option from an offline seed.

/cc @gorazdko @wolfmcnally @Fonta1n3

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Direzione di ricerca

Start by reviewing the keytool CLI entry points and the related issues #12 and #13, then compare the proposed 48h/0h/0h/2h cosigner flow with crypto-account and LetheKit. Done means the requirements for a --cosigner shortcut and its short-text and UR QR output are settled, including the optional label and birthday.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Valutazione

Stack tecnologico
cpp
Ambito
blockchain, cli, cryptography
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Difficoltà
5/5
Tempo stimato
Più di una settimana
Stato di attività
Ferma
Chiarezza
Da chiarire
Idoneità per principianti
25/100

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.