BlockchainCommons / BlockchainCommons/keytool-cli
--cosigner option?
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- C++
- Sterne
- 6
- Forks
- 5
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.
Beschreibung
Related to #12 & #13 & to LetheKit:
I think one of the most common uses for us (Blockchain Commons) is to get the 48h/0h/0h/2h cosigner derivation into the short text & a UR QR form (with the optional label and birthday), suitable for offering or receiving as part of a Policy Map -> Account Map process. Thus could maybe be a --cosigner shortcut option for keytool.
Currently I don't think we can use `crypto-account` for this, so we need to puzzle that through.
Note that this does not solve the problem of cosigner reuse: later we figure out a good way to have different cosigners for different Account Maps we'll need to puzzle that through as well. But a simple `--cosigner` option will help a lot.
Related, we may want to explicitly add this 48h/0h/0h/2h cosigner UR to LetheKit, as it long-term may be the most common export option from an offline seed.
/cc @gorazdko @wolfmcnally @Fonta1n3
Beitragsleitfaden
Rechercherichtung
Start by reviewing the keytool CLI entry points and the related issues #12 and #13, then compare the proposed 48h/0h/0h/2h cosigner flow with crypto-account and LetheKit. Done means the requirements for a --cosigner shortcut and its short-text and UR QR output are settled, including the optional label and birthday.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- cpp
- Bereich
- blockchain, cli, cryptography
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Muss geklärt werden
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 25/100