BlockchainCommons / BlockchainCommons/keytool-cli

--cosigner option?

Offen
#14 0 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen
Vorherrschende Sprache
C++
Sterne
6
Forks
5
PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.

Beschreibung

Related to #12 & #13 & to LetheKit:

I think one of the most common uses for us (Blockchain Commons) is to get the 48h/0h/0h/2h cosigner derivation into the short text & a UR QR form (with the optional label and birthday), suitable for offering or receiving as part of a Policy Map -> Account Map process. Thus could maybe be a --cosigner shortcut option for keytool.

Currently I don't think we can use `crypto-account` for this, so we need to puzzle that through.

Note that this does not solve the problem of cosigner reuse: later we figure out a good way to have different cosigners for different Account Maps we'll need to puzzle that through as well. But a simple `--cosigner` option will help a lot.

Related, we may want to explicitly add this 48h/0h/0h/2h cosigner UR to LetheKit, as it long-term may be the most common export option from an offline seed.

/cc @gorazdko @wolfmcnally @Fonta1n3

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Rechercherichtung

Start by reviewing the keytool CLI entry points and the related issues #12 and #13, then compare the proposed 48h/0h/0h/2h cosigner flow with crypto-account and LetheKit. Done means the requirements for a --cosigner shortcut and its short-text and UR QR output are settled, including the optional label and birthday.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Bewertung

Tech-Stack
cpp
Bereich
blockchain, cli, cryptography
Issue-Typ
Feature
Schwierigkeit
5/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
Über eine Woche
Aktivitätsstatus
Veraltet
Klarheit
Muss geklärt werden
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
25/100

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.