Support Distributed writes with EEL
- 主要言語
- Scala
- スター
- 147
- フォーク
- 32
- PR マージ指標
- 30日以内にマージされた PR はありません
説明
Support Distributed writes with EEL
- N writers via JdbcSource -> KafkaSink
- N Writers via HiveSink/KuduSink/HBaseSink
- Now what if the **HiveSink** and others that use a **LinkedBlockingQueue** to service multiple writer threads could do this in a distributed fashion by wrapping the **LinkedBlockingQueue** interface, i.e. an implementation that wraps a Kafka topic - default one would still remain as threads?
- The gotcha is that when you are out-of-process you lose control on how to partition the data into reasonable sizes
- However for row oriented storage systems like Kudu and HBase it's perfect - the same usage pattern would even work for the JdbcSink
What do you think?
コントリビューションガイド
このリポジトリのコントリビューションガイドは索引されていません
調査の方向性
The issue proposes distributed writes by replacing LinkedBlockingQueue with a Kafka topic wrapper for sinks like HiveSink, KuduSink, HBaseSink, and JdbcSink. Start by examining the sink implementations in the codebase, particularly the queueing mechanism. Understand how partitioning works for row-oriented storage systems. The goal is to design a distributed queue interface that maintains data partitioning control.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- kafka, scala
- 領域
- backend, data-engineering, stream-processing
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 明瞭さ
- 説明が足りない
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 20/100