Support Distributed writes with EEL
- Lenguaje dominante
- Scala
- Estrellas
- 147
- Forks
- 32
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Descripción
Support Distributed writes with EEL
- N writers via JdbcSource -> KafkaSink
- N Writers via HiveSink/KuduSink/HBaseSink
- Now what if the **HiveSink** and others that use a **LinkedBlockingQueue** to service multiple writer threads could do this in a distributed fashion by wrapping the **LinkedBlockingQueue** interface, i.e. an implementation that wraps a Kafka topic - default one would still remain as threads?
- The gotcha is that when you are out-of-process you lose control on how to partition the data into reasonable sizes
- However for row oriented storage systems like Kudu and HBase it's perfect - the same usage pattern would even work for the JdbcSink
What do you think?
Guía de contribución
No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio
Línea de trabajo
The issue proposes distributed writes by replacing LinkedBlockingQueue with a Kafka topic wrapper for sinks like HiveSink, KuduSink, HBaseSink, and JdbcSink. Start by examining the sink implementations in the codebase, particularly the queueing mechanism. Understand how partitioning works for row-oriented storage systems. The goal is to design a distributed queue interface that maintains data partitioning control.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- kafka, scala
- Área
- backend, data-engineering, stream-processing
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 20/100