Support Distributed writes with EEL
- Lingua principale
- Scala
- Stelle
- 147
- Fork
- 32
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Descrizione
Support Distributed writes with EEL
- N writers via JdbcSource -> KafkaSink
- N Writers via HiveSink/KuduSink/HBaseSink
- Now what if the **HiveSink** and others that use a **LinkedBlockingQueue** to service multiple writer threads could do this in a distributed fashion by wrapping the **LinkedBlockingQueue** interface, i.e. an implementation that wraps a Kafka topic - default one would still remain as threads?
- The gotcha is that when you are out-of-process you lose control on how to partition the data into reasonable sizes
- However for row oriented storage systems like Kudu and HBase it's perfect - the same usage pattern would even work for the JdbcSink
What do you think?
Guida per i contributori
Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository
Direzione di ricerca
The issue proposes distributed writes by replacing LinkedBlockingQueue with a Kafka topic wrapper for sinks like HiveSink, KuduSink, HBaseSink, and JdbcSink. Start by examining the sink implementations in the codebase, particularly the queueing mechanism. Understand how partitioning works for row-oriented storage systems. The goal is to design a distributed queue interface that maintains data partitioning control.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Stack tecnologico
- kafka, scala
- Ambito
- backend, data-engineering, stream-processing
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Chiarezza
- Da chiarire
- Idoneità per principianti
- 20/100