0xMiden / 0xMiden/tutorials

WebClient tutorials: Convert tutorials to use Vite instead of NextJS

未關閉
#116 3 則留言 1 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視
主要語言
Rust
星號
18
分支
34
PR 合併指標
30 天內沒有已合併 PR

描述

I think we should switch to using Vite instead of NextJS. Vite allows us not to worry about server-side rendering and the issues that come with that when using the web client SDK. This will allow for cleaner and more readable tutorial code.

Nevertheless, I think we should include a separate section (disclaimer) in the docs that, when using NextJS, one has to use dynamic imports (including an example), which should be clearly visible to anyone working with the web SDK.

One of our pioneers, Zoro, are using Vite for their frontend, and I must say that their web client code is by far more cleaner than our current tutorial code, since they can avoid the dynamic import restriction using Vite.

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

研究方向

Find the existing Next.js tutorial code in the repository, likely in a `web-client` or similar directory. Understand how the current examples work and the dynamic import pattern mentioned. Research Vite setup and create equivalent examples. The goal is to replace the tutorial code with Vite-based versions and add a clear Next.js disclaimer section to the documentation.

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

評估

技術堆疊
javascript, next.js, react, typescript, vite
領域
documentation, frontend, web-dev
Issue 類型
重構
難度
3/5
預估耗時
1-2 天
活躍度
冷清
描述清晰度
基本清楚
新手友好度
55/100

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。