0xMiden / 0xMiden/tutorials

WebClient tutorials: Convert tutorials to use Vite instead of NextJS

Aberta
#116 3 comentários 1 reação 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub
Linguagem predominante
Rust
Estrelas
18
Forks
34
Métricas de merge de PRs
Nenhum PR com merge em 30d

Descrição

I think we should switch to using Vite instead of NextJS. Vite allows us not to worry about server-side rendering and the issues that come with that when using the web client SDK. This will allow for cleaner and more readable tutorial code.

Nevertheless, I think we should include a separate section (disclaimer) in the docs that, when using NextJS, one has to use dynamic imports (including an example), which should be clearly visible to anyone working with the web SDK.

One of our pioneers, Zoro, are using Vite for their frontend, and I must say that their web client code is by far more cleaner than our current tutorial code, since they can avoid the dynamic import restriction using Vite.

Guia de contribuição

Abrir o guia de contribuição

Direção de pesquisa

Find the existing Next.js tutorial code in the repository, likely in a `web-client` or similar directory. Understand how the current examples work and the dynamic import pattern mentioned. Research Vite setup and create equivalent examples. The goal is to replace the tutorial code with Vite-based versions and add a clear Next.js disclaimer section to the documentation.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Avaliação

Stack de tecnologia
javascript, next.js, react, typescript, vite
Domínio
documentation, frontend, web-dev
Tipo de issue
Refatoração
Dificuldade
3/5
Tempo estimado
1-2 dias
Status de atividade
Pouca atividade
Clareza
Razoavelmente clara
Facilidade para iniciantes
55/100

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.