0xMiden / 0xMiden/tutorials

WebClient tutorials: Convert tutorials to use Vite instead of NextJS

Aperta
#116 3 commenti 1 reazione 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub
Lingua principale
Rust
Stelle
18
Fork
34
Metriche di merge delle PR
Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g

Descrizione

I think we should switch to using Vite instead of NextJS. Vite allows us not to worry about server-side rendering and the issues that come with that when using the web client SDK. This will allow for cleaner and more readable tutorial code.

Nevertheless, I think we should include a separate section (disclaimer) in the docs that, when using NextJS, one has to use dynamic imports (including an example), which should be clearly visible to anyone working with the web SDK.

One of our pioneers, Zoro, are using Vite for their frontend, and I must say that their web client code is by far more cleaner than our current tutorial code, since they can avoid the dynamic import restriction using Vite.

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Direzione di ricerca

Find the existing Next.js tutorial code in the repository, likely in a `web-client` or similar directory. Understand how the current examples work and the dynamic import pattern mentioned. Research Vite setup and create equivalent examples. The goal is to replace the tutorial code with Vite-based versions and add a clear Next.js disclaimer section to the documentation.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Valutazione

Stack tecnologico
javascript, next.js, react, typescript, vite
Ambito
documentation, frontend, web-dev
Tipo di issue
Refactoring
Difficoltà
3/5
Tempo stimato
1-2 giorni
Stato di attività
Tranquilla
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Idoneità per principianti
55/100

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.