[coverage] Conformance findings: STATEMENT-025
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
调研方向
首先阅读 coverage PR 中失败的测试 test_cancel_during_result_fetch_is_prompt_and_signal_only,并针对 thrift 和 Rust-kernel 的 SEA 路径分别运行该测试。将 driver 的行为与 STATEMENT-025 contract 和 PR 362 进行比较;当 fetch 取消能够及时完成、报告 SQL state 为 HY008 的取消错误,且后续语句仍能正常工作时,即视为完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Summary
Surfaced by the multi-language coverage fan-out while conformance-testing these SPEC-IDs against databricks/databricks-sql-python. Each finding is committed as an expected-failure (xfail) test in the coverage PR — the test asserts the CORRECT (post-fix) behavior and stays red until THIS driver (databricks/databricks-sql-python) is fixed, then flips green as a tripwire.
Findings
- STATEMENT-025 [thrift]: Cancel during result FETCH unwinds the fetching thread with wrong-state RESOURCE_DOES_NOT_EXIST ('Command does not exist') instead of a cancellation error
- failing test:
test_cancel_during_result_fetch_is_prompt_and_signal_only(see the coverage PR diff undertests/)
- failing test:
- STATEMENT-025 [sea]: Cancel issued during a result FETCH is silently dropped on the Rust-kernel SEA path, so the in-flight fetch never unwinds and drains to natural completion
- failing test:
test_cancel_during_result_fetch_is_prompt_and_signal_only(see the coverage PR diff undertests/)
- failing test:
- STATEMENT-025: Cursor.cancel() issued during a result FETCH is not honoured on either backend: thrift's interrupted fetch unwinds with wrong-state RESOURCE_DOES_NOT_EXIST instead of a cancellation error, and the Rust-kernel SEA path drops the cancel entirely so the fetch drains to natural completion; after a sync execute() returns, no cancellable in-flight operation is registered for the fetch phase
Reproduce & Expected
STATEMENT-025 — Validates cancellation while a result set is being FETCHED (not merely while the statement is EXECUTING -- that is STATEMENT-015/022).
Reproduce:
SELECT * FROM main.tpcds_sf1_delta.catalog_returns
SELECT 1
SELECT * FROM main.tpcds_sf1_delta.catalog_returns
Expected (per the shared spec):
- completes without an exception
- completes without an exception
- completes without an exception
- result has exactly 1 row(s)
- completes without an exception
- full assertion contract:
result:
- label: idle_cancel
no_exception: true
- label: mid_fetch_cancel
no_exception: true
- label: mid_fetch_cancel
elapsed_seconds_range:
min: 0
max: 5
- label: cancelled_fetch
error:
contains:
- cancel
- cancelled
- canceled
- aborted
- label: cancelled_fetch
sql_state: HY008
- label: cancelled_fetch
elapsed_seconds_range:
min: 0
max: 30
- label: reused_statement
no_exception: true
- label: reused_statement
row_count: 1
- label: concurrent_cancel
no_exception: true
- label: concurrent_cancelled_fetch
elapsed_seconds_range:
min: 0
max: 30
Context
- The behavior was first fixed in a DIFFERENT driver — reference PR: https://github.com/databricks/databricks-odbc/pull/362 — which seeded the shared language-neutral spec. This issue tracks the same conformance gap in databricks/databricks-sql-python; the reference PR is for cross-referencing the intended behavior, NOT a change to this repo.
- Coverage PR carrying the reproducing xfail test(s): https://github.com/databricks/databricks-driver-test/pull/1562
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 233
- 派生
- 152
- 平均合并
- 21 小时 5 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 10
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
databricks/databricks-sql-python 的其他 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
查看 databricks/databricks-sql-python 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 86/100
-
🐛 Bug 🔔 Pending processing
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
jumpserver/jumpserver#17584 ·