See if it's possible to swap in `pixi` for `uv`

未关闭
#559 1 条评论 1 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
3/5
预计耗时
1-2 天
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 类型
文档
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
python
领域
documentation

调研方向

Start with the template's documentation instructions and identify every invocation of uv. Check whether the equivalent workflow is supported by pixi, including the machine-learning packages mentioned as available on conda-forge. Done means documenting whether substitution is possible and, if appropriate, recommending pixi as an alternative.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

documentation investigate
Which Section of the Documentation Needs Improving?

The instructions for using the template

What Can be Improved About This Section

At the workshop today, someone asked "why not using pixi instead of uv". It's a good question, and it might be posible to just swap every invocation of uv with pixi in our docs. It would be nice to see if this is possible, and if it is recommend it as another option, becaue especially for machine learning code there are several packages available on conda-forge that aren't on PyPI.

How to Improve This Section

No response

主要语言
Python
星标
62
派生
10
平均合并
7 天 6 小时
30 天内合并 PR
6

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

UCL-ARC/python-tooling 的其他 Issue

查看 UCL-ARC/python-tooling 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。