w3c/json-ld-syntax

View on GitHub

JSON-LD 1.1 Specification

Stars: 139
Forks: 23
Open beginner issues: 0
Indexed issues: 55

Dominant language: HTML
License: No license data
Last GitHub push: Jun 24, 2026
Latest indexed: Sep 20, 2026
Contributing guide: Contributing guide
Code of conduct: Code of conduct
Beginner labels: No beginner labels indexed
PR merge metrics: No merged PRs in 30d

Beginner friendly Everything

Open All

55 open issues indexed

Use "Language Value Object" phrase within the specifications. Open

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#500 · Opened Sep 8, 2026
Add note about `\u` entities being decoded via `JSON.parse()`. Open

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#499 · 1 comment · 2 reactions · Opened Sep 2, 2026
Specify that contexts should be in JSON-LD Open

w3c/json-ld-syntax#497 · 2 comments · 1 assignee · Opened Jul 22, 2026
Cannot use `@reverse` combined with `"@container": "@id"` Open

Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#496 · Opened Jun 26, 2026
Terms defined using list containers only preserve the latest-declared list value? Open

needs discussion

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 38/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#492 · 2 comments · Opened Apr 19, 2026
extend language maps to support base direction Open

substantive:class 4

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#489 · 2 comments · Opened Mar 16, 2026
should JSON-LD 1.2 support RDF 1.2 basic ? Open

substantive:class 4

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#488 · 18 comments · 6 reactions · Opened Mar 14, 2026
avoid the term "remote" when talking of "context by reference" Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 42/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#487 · 2 reactions · Opened Mar 11, 2026
Included blocks + node identifier indexing Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#486 · Opened Mar 10, 2026
Consistency of files under `./common` Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#480 · 2 comments · Opened Jan 23, 2026
Clarification: Example 45, expansion of interest.name Open

propose closing

Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#478 · 1 comment · Opened Dec 24, 2025
Strike “See” Open

editorial:class 2 spec:editorial

Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 55/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#475 · 1 reaction · Opened Dec 24, 2025
String value of @type expanded to IRI Open

editorial:class 2 spec:editorial

Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 48/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#474 · 3 comments · 1 reaction · Opened Dec 24, 2025
Strike “also” Open

editorial:class 2 spec:editorial

Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 50/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#473 · 1 reaction · Opened Dec 24, 2025
“An IRIs” should be “an IRI” Open

editorial:class 2 spec:editorial

Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 68/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#472 · 1 reaction · Opened Dec 24, 2025
Feat: add `rel="http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#type"` link relation. Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#470 · 1 comment · 1 reaction · Opened Dec 1, 2025
Expected interaction between nested properties and contexts? Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#469 · 4 comments · Opened Oct 31, 2025
Type coercion using xsd equivalents for native JSON datatypes leads to unexpected results Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#464 · Opened Jun 17, 2025
Should character-escaping be applied when generating JSON-LD IRIs? Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 30/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#463 · 1 reaction · Opened Jun 11, 2025
Handling JSON-LD with duplicate names Open

Editorial ErratumRaised

Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#459 · 6 comments · Opened May 6, 2025
reflect change in common from w3c/json-ld-api#638 once merged Open

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 35/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#454 · Opened Mar 12, 2025
minor rewording re application of type-scoped contexts Open

Editorial ErratumRaised

Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 72/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#445 · Opened Nov 10, 2024
Linking a JSON-LD context with an RDF-S/OWL schema Open

best practice defer-future-version

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#442 · 13 comments · Opened Sep 24, 2024
Why are value objects ineligible to be type map values? Open

defer-future-version ms:future-work spec:substantive substantive:class 3

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#440 · 2 comments · Opened Aug 19, 2024
Update section on rdf:JSON to reference RDF Concepts version Open

defer-future-version spec:substantive substantive:class 3

Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 55/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#437 · Opened Jul 10, 2024
Privacy Considerations: Additional guidance on handling of remote contexts when forwarding documents Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 20/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#430 · 1 comment · Opened Apr 6, 2024
List of lists? Open

ErratumRaised

Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#428 · 4 comments · Opened Feb 17, 2024
how to "retype" rdf:JSON to geo:geoJSONLiteral? Open

spec:enhancement

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#425 · 16 comments · Opened Jan 23, 2024
Normative references to discontinued specs in JSON-LD 1.1 Open

editorial:class 2 ErratumRaised spec:editorial

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 45/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#423 · Opened Dec 6, 2023
Allow JSON-LD documents to "pin" their @contexts and @imports Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#422 · 2 comments · 1 reaction · Opened Nov 14, 2023
JSON-LD Context similarity to XML External Entity attack Open

best practice

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#421 · 6 comments · Opened Nov 3, 2023
feature request: mapping on simple paths Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#419 · Opened Oct 3, 2023
Change "Lexicographical Order" (and related) to "Unicode code point order". Open

Editorial editorial:class 2 Errata wr:spec-updated

Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#416 · 1 comment · Opened Aug 8, 2023
[Question] How to do an array of arrays in a JSON-LD @context Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#414 · 3 comments · Opened May 4, 2023
Clarification needed for expansion of terms with `@container` set to `@id` and a local context with a `@base` Open

ErratumRaised spec:substantive

Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 38/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#412 · 3 comments · Opened Apr 1, 2023
RDF* in CBOR? Open

spec:enhancement substantive:class 4

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 20/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#451 · 3 comments · Opened Nov 29, 2022
bug in example-http-request-with-profile-requesting-a-compacted-document-with-a-reference-to-a-compaction-context Open

Editorial ErratumRaised

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 45/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#402 · Opened Nov 23, 2022
Examples 119 and 120 don't seem right Open

Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#398 · Opened Jun 21, 2022
clarify that `@none @id` are blank nodes, swap Examples 104 and 105 Open

Editorial ErratumRaised

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 35/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#397 · 2 comments · Opened Jun 21, 2022
minor typo for `@none` language Open

Editorial ErratumRaised

Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 55/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#396 · Opened Jun 21, 2022
Elaborate on handling of JSON builtin types `integer` and `double` Open

Editorial editorial:class 2 Errata

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 28/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#387 · 11 comments · Opened Feb 1, 2022
Specify a node type when interpreting JSON as JSON-LD (was: use of "@type" in "@context") Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#386 · 19 comments · 1 reaction · Opened Jan 18, 2022
would it be possible to reserve @view for JSON-LD v.next Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#384 · 11 comments · Opened Dec 15, 2021
creating new vocabulary terms section 4.1.3 and 4.1.4 Open

Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 45/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#383 · 1 comment · Opened Nov 30, 2021
Make it easier to keep semantics of object-oriented models Open

defer-future-version needs discussion

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#376 · 13 comments · 1 reaction · Opened Jun 19, 2021
Support multiple IRIs for `@reverse` Open

defer-future-version ms:future-work needs discussion spec:enhancement

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#372 · 6 comments · Opened Apr 8, 2021
New feature: `@template` Open

defer-future-version

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#362 · 12 comments · 6 reactions · Opened Sep 24, 2020
Support non-propagating protected terms Open

needs discussion spec:enhancement

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 20/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#361 · 5 comments · 1 reaction · Opened Jul 18, 2020
Kill "IRI"? Open

spec:editorial

w3c/json-ld-syntax#355 · 10 comments · 3 reactions · 1 assignee · Opened Jun 24, 2020
Type Coercion / Node Conversion: @coerce keyword or similar Open

defer-future-version

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 30/100

w3c/json-ld-syntax#335 · 5 comments · 3 reactions · Opened Feb 29, 2020

w3c/json-ld-syntax

Get new issues in your inbox