Examples 119 and 120 don't seem right
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 139
- Forks
- 23
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
(related to #397)
- Example 119 https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-syntax/#example-indexing-graph-data-in-json-ld
- Example 120 https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-syntax/#example-indexing-graphs-using-none-for-no-index
Are supposed to demonstrate "default graph referencing multiple named graphs using an index map".
- But both graphs end up being anonymous.
- Especially Example 120 is supposed to show the difference between
enand@nonebut both graphs are anonymous
- Especially Example 120 is supposed to show the difference between
- Also, both examples show a warning (or error?) in the playground. Maybe the JSON schema in the playground is not up to date?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by comparing Examples 119 and 120 at the linked JSON-LD Syntax sections with their stated goal of demonstrating indexed named graphs. Check the playground warnings and the JSON schema behavior; done when the examples correctly distinguish named graphs, including en versus @none, and the warnings are resolved or explained.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- json
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100