Support discovery baselines for brownfield accounts
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- aws, typescript
Research direction
Start by reading the existing discovery configuration under packages/sdk/src/config/ and the inline-suppression behavior for IaC. Trace the cloudburn discover entry point, then define how baseline entries match findings and how excluded counts or JSON are reported. Done means an accepted baseline can be generated, referenced, and audited without hiding excluded findings.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
What
Support excluding accepted findings from discover runs via config or a committed baseline file: resource IDs/ARNs accepted per rule, with an optional command to generate the baseline from a current run.
Why
A first discover against an existing account evaluates 72 discovery-capable rules and produces a wall of findings with no way to ratchet. Teams need to accept current state, then fail only on new waste — the standard brownfield-adoption pattern for policy tools.
Details
- Config shape: per-rule exclusion lists under the existing
discoverymode section (packages/sdk/src/config/), or a dedicated baseline file referenced from config. - Matching keys off
FindingMatch.resourceId(plusregion/accountIdwhere present). - A
cloudburn discover --write-baseline(ordiscover baselinesubcommand) that snapshots current findings into the file, so adoption is one command. - Excluded findings surface as a count / JSON array, mirroring the inline-suppression behavior for IaC, so nothing disappears silently.
- Baseline entries should support an optional reason/date for auditability.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 1.8k
- Forks
- 371
- Avg merge
- 4h 32m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 63
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from towardsthecloud/cloudburn
-
cloudburn-platform enhancement
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
towardsthecloud/cloudburn#285 ·
-
cloudburn-platform enhancement
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 45/100
towardsthecloud/cloudburn#284 ·
-
cloudburn-platform enhancement
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
towardsthecloud/cloudburn#283 ·
-
cloudburn-platform enhancement
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
towardsthecloud/cloudburn#281 ·
-
cloudburn-platform enhancement
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
towardsthecloud/cloudburn#282 ·
All issues in towardsthecloud/cloudburn
Similar issues
-
clawsweeper:fix-shape-clear clawsweeper:queueable-fix clawsweeper:source-repro impact:ux-friction issue-rating: 🦞 diamond lobster no-stale P3
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
community first-timers-only good first issue hacktoberfest help wanted low hanging fruit up-for-grabs
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
code-quality refactoring
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
github/gh-aw-firewall#8816 ·
-
integration:quickjs org:external priority:backlog topic:code-interpreter topic:middleware type:feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
langchain-ai/deepagents#6450 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
vercel/react-tweet#225 ·