testcontainers / testcontainers/testcontainers-java
GenericContainer tries to talk to remote registry too soon (during instance initialization)
まだ誰も着手していません。
- 主要言語
- Java
- スター
- 8.7k
- フォーク
- 1.9k
- 平均マージ
- 2日 17時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 9
説明
I'm running tests on a machine that doesn't currently have connectivity to the Docker Hub. Certainly, I expect TestContainer-based cases to fail in that case. So I have written a JUnit rule to conditionally disable these test cases when a certain configuration setting has been made, and write something like this in my test case:
public static ConditionalIgnore skip =
ConditionalIgnore.needsDocker(ConfigFactory.load("test"));
// VaultContainer is my own subclass of GenericContainer
public static VaultContainer VAULT = new VaultContainer();
@ClassRule
public static final RuleChain rules = RuleChain.outerRule(skip)
.around(VAULT);
The problem I'm seeing is, however, that this requires instantiating the VaultContainer class, which will call the GenericContainer constructors, and those constructors will actually try to talk to the Docker Hub:
Caused by: org.testcontainers.containers.ContainerFetchException: Can't get Docker image name from org.testcontainers.images.RemoteDockerImage@4a0952ab
at org.testcontainers.containers.GenericContainer.getDockerImageName(GenericContainer.java:711)
at org.testcontainers.containers.GenericContainer.setDockerImageName(GenericContainer.java:699)
at org.testcontainers.containers.GenericContainer.<init>(GenericContainer.java:145)
at com.progressfin.foundation.secret.VaultContainer.<init>(VaultContainer.java:33)
at com.progressfin.foundation.secret.VaultContainer.<init>(VaultContainer.java:29)
at com.progressfin.foundation.secret.VaultSecretsTest.<clinit>(VaultSecretsTest.java:30)
... 40 more
Caused by: org.testcontainers.shaded.com.github.dockerjava.api.exception.InternalServerErrorException: {"message":"Get https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/: read tcp 1.2.3.4:54526->4.3.2.1:443: read: connection reset by peer"}
The problem is here (line numbers don't match up because the stack trace is from 1.1.6):
There's a very interesting comment there ("Mimic old behavior where we resolve image once it's set") that tells us that this behavior is intentional. What I would suggest is that the behavior is at odds with the sort of uses that JUnit rules are meant to support; the test rule should arguably take no "risky" actions at all unless the Statement is actually invoked, i.e. in the GenericContainer.start() method, which already does call the getDockerImageName() method anyway. (And is it just me, or is it also weird that a String getter like getDockerImageName() would talk to the network?)
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
調査の方向性
コンストラクター、および setDockerImageName()、getDockerImageName()、start() のエントリーポイント付近にある core/src/main/java/org/testcontainers/containers/GenericContainer.java を読みます。コンテナの構築時にはリモートレジストリに接続せず、起動時には引き続きイメージが解決されることを確認します。関連する既存のコンテナテストでこの動作を確認してください。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- docker, java
- 領域
- testing
- issue の種類
- バグ
- 難易度
- 3/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1〜2日
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 明瞭さ
- 明確に書かれている
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 45/100