spring-cloud / spring-cloud/spring-cloud-github-actions

update-project-versions and verify-no-snapshot-versions can drift with nothing testing the pair

オープン
#22 コメント 0 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

bug
主要言語
言語のデータがありません
スター
0
フォーク
0
平均マージ
2時間 31分
マージ済み PR(30日)
6

説明

verify-no-snapshot-versions rejects versions in locations that update-project-versions never writes, so a release can fail its own gate on something the automation was supposed to have fixed. Nothing tests the two actions together, so the two sides can drift silently.

How it surfaced

spring-cloud-function-commercial 5.0.4 passed readiness on 2026-08-04. spring-cloud-function-commercial release/5.1.0-M1 failed on 2026-09-07 with 12 violations, all in spring-cloud-function-samples/**/build.gradle.

Running each historical verifier against the same unchanged file:

Verifier Date Violations
b950928 2026-06-25 1 — version = only
a760372 2026-08-08 3 — plus springBootVersion, springCloudFunctionVersion

a760372 broadened the verifier to nested locations, which for build.gradle swept in ext { xxxVersion = ... } blocks. updateBuildGradleContent only ever rewrote the single version = '...' line, so the two stopped agreeing. Both actions' test suites stayed green for a month, because neither exercises the other.

The build.gradle half is now fixed — the updater resolves {prefix}Version properties the way gradle.properties already did, and rewrites inline org.springframework.* dependency coordinates for artifacts the train releases.

Still open

Location Verifier Updater
settings.gradle, settings.gradle.kts checks never opens the file
pom inline <dependency> / <plugin> / <extension> <version> checks reads, never writes — it writes only the project version, the parent version and properties

Neither has bitten yet: Spring Cloud poms express dependency versions through properties, and versions in settings.gradle are unusual. Both are the same shape as the bug above, waiting on the right repository.

Why identical coverage is the wrong goal

The verifier must catch things the updater must never touch. A -SNAPSHOT on a third-party dependency has to fail the release, and rewriting it to a Spring Cloud version would be wrong — that is exactly what a760372 was added for. The invariant worth enforcing is narrower:

Every location the verifier rejects is either one the updater fixed, or one nothing could fix — and the second kind is visible before the release, not at the gate.

Suggested approach

  1. A conformance test. One fixture per file type, with a version in every location the verifier knows about. Run updater, then verifier, assert zero violations. This is the test that did not exist on 2026-08-08: it would have failed the moment the verifier was broadened. Cheap, and needs no refactoring. The fixture doubles as a readable specification of every place a version is managed.
  2. Have the updater report what it skipped. When it meets a version-shaped value it cannot map to a project, log it as unmanaged. Turns a surprise gate failure into a visible line at stamp time, and covers the genuinely unfixable third-party case too.
  3. A shared location model, only if divergence continues. One module enumerating version locations per file type, with the verifier flagging them and the updater writing those that resolve to a project. Makes divergence structurally impossible rather than merely tested against, at the cost of refactoring two actions that carry ~200 tests between them.

Recommend 1 and 2; keep 3 in reserve.

References

コントリビューションガイド

このリポジトリのコントリビューションガイドは索引されていません

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

調査の方向性

.github/actions/update-project-versions/src/index.js と .github/actions/verify-no-snapshot-versions/src/index.js から始め、次に両方の actions の既存のテストスイートを読みます。verifier のバージョン箇所を網羅する fixture をファイル種別ごとに 1 つ追加し、updater と verifier を一緒に実行します。予期しない違反がなく、バージョン形式の未管理の値が目に見える形で報告されることを完了の条件とします。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

評価

技術スタック
javascript
領域
ci-cd, testing
issue の種類
バグ
難易度
4/5
見積もり時間
3〜5日
活発さ
活発
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
初心者へのやさしさ
56/100

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。