long matches in switch statements mutline-formats records (but moving to next line is better)

switch "" {
| "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" => {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}
}

formats to:

switch "" {
| "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" => {
    a: 1,
    b: 2,
    c: 3,
  }
}

but this would likely be better:

switch "" {
| "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" =>
  {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}
}

the formatter won't let you do that, but splits it to multiplie lines again. workaround i use is to add a comment:

switch "" {
| "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" => //
  {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}
}

minor, but it's still an annoyance

Beginne damit, den Formatter-Einstiegspunkt für switch-Anweisungen und match-Arme zu finden, und reproduziere dann das bereitgestellte Beispiel mit einem langen String. Erledigt ist die Aufgabe, wenn der Formatter einen langen match-Arm in der nächsten Zeile platziert und dessen record kompakt hält, ohne einen Kommentar-Workaround zu erfordern.