Request for clarification: can ref initialization code (lazy or not) contain side effects?

New docs on avoiding recreating ref contents has two examples:

Example1:

const playerRef = useRef(new VideoPlayer());

Example2:

const playerRef = useRef(null);
if (playerRef.current === null) {
  playerRef.current = new VideoPlayer();
}

Even the old docs have similar examples:

Example3:

const ref = useRef(new IntersectionObserver(onIntersect));

Example4:

const ref = useRef(null);
if (ref.current === null) {
   ref.current = new IntersectionObserver(onIntersect);
}

Both new VideoPlayer() and new IntersectionObserver(onIntersect) look like calls that might contain side effects inside.
My question is it allowed in any of the above examples, for these calls to contain side effects?

• imho in Examples 1/3 they should not because they are executed on each render; although only values from initial render are kept.

• But examples 2/4 suggest a pattern which make reading and writing to refs ok - which normally is an impure operation already. So I thought maybe in those examples at least, it is ok for new VideoPlayer() and new IntersectionObserver(onIntersect) to contain side effects?

It would be helpful if the docs clarified this.

從目前關於 useRef 的「avoiding recreating the ref contents」段落，以及連結的 Legacy Hooks FAQ 中關於延遲建立高成本物件的段落開始。比較全部四個範例，並確認 React 對於 render 時副作用的指引。完成的標準是文件清楚說明這些初始化模式是否可以包含副作用，並區分它們的行為。