onClick concepts in docs
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
- Lingua principale
- JavaScript
- Stelle
- 11.8k
- Fork
- 7.9k
- Merge medio
- 1g 11h
- PR unite (30g)
- 11
Descrizione
In https://reactjs.org/docs/handling-events.html
It is said that
return (
<button onClick={(e) => this.handleClick(e)}>
and then:
The problem with this syntax is that a different callback is created each time the LoggingButton renders. In most cases, this is fine. However, if this callback is passed as a prop to lower components, those components might do an extra re-rendering.
This is actually wrong concept.
(it may make the reader think, so "if the props passed to lower components don't change, then the lower components won't re-render"... in general that's not true. It is only true if the lower components are PureComponent or React.memo() or useMemo() optimized)
-
First, this itself is a problem, even if it is not passed down to to a lower component. Because when this is rendered to a virtual DOM tree, it is compared to the previous virtual DOM tree, and seeing it is a different click handler, it needs to update the actual DOM -- either by changing the
onclickattribute or byremoveEventListener()andaddEventListener()to change the handler. Usually we don't want to update the actual DOM, as it is much more expensive than the virtual DOM. -
Second, no matter it is passed down to lower components, the lower components will re-render anyway. UNLESS if the lower components are PureComponent or are optimized by React.memo(). But if they are just Component, the lower components are re-rendered anyway. So this conveys a wrong concept. It can cause actual DOM update in lower components, but this is covered in (1) already, and is true regardless of whether it is passed down the lower components.
-
One possibility is that changing the event listener is not as costly as other actual DOM operations, so the concern is if the click handler is passed down to lower components and the components use a PureComponent or React.memo to not re-render when the props didn't change, and passing in a new handler will cause the lower components to re-render. But this is the case only if lower components are not the regular Component. If the docs assumed that without mentioning it, it can cause mis-concepts.
So the actual problem is about needing to cause an update to the actual DOM.
And the word "re-render" above doesn't mean an update to actual DOM. "re-render" means making a virtual DOM tree, either by the render() of a class component, or by a function component returning React elements just like render(). (just to make sure we are talking about the same thing).
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Direzione di ricerca
Esamina la documentazione sulla gestione degli eventi all'indirizzo https://reactjs.org/docs/handling-events.html, in particolare la spiegazione citata del callback di LoggingButton. Chiarisci la distinzione tra la creazione di un nuovo callback, il nuovo rendering di un componente, i componenti figli ottimizzati e gli aggiornamenti effettivi del DOM; completato quando il testo non implica più che le props invariate da sole impediscano un nuovo rendering.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Stack tecnologico
- javascript, react
- Ambito
- documentation
- Tipo di issue
- Documentazione
- Difficoltà
- 3/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Idoneità per principianti
- 45/100