[Android] Timing of NativeCommands delivery vs. calls of TurboModule methods vs. AppState changes
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- C++
- 星标
- 127k
- 派生
- 25.3k
- 平均合并
- 1 天 23 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 4
描述
Description
Not sure, is it a bug, or a peculiarity of the new architecture, but here is my scenario. My app uses RN 0.74.2, with new arch, bridgeless. It has an internal web server (my @dr.pogodin/react-native-static-server — a TurboModule), and it has a WebView (my slightly enhanced fork of react-native-webview — a Fabric component), which loads assets from that web server. When the app goes into background I want to abort any in-flight loading by RN WebView, and then shutdown the server. To do so, I listen for AppState change, and when the state changes to background I call RN WebView's stopLoading() method, and my server's stop() command; both calls are passed to the native side, via Fabric's NativeCommand in WebView case, and via TurboModule method call in my server's case.
Now I am testing it on Android, with a bunch of debug logging, and native debugger at hands. I see the following:
- I send my app to the background.
- Both WebView's
stopLoading()and server'sstop()are called in JS layer. - The server's TurboModule
stop()operation is successfully executed in the native layer, and it even manages to emit back a notification that server stopped (usingRCTDeviceEventEmitter) so that in JS layer a message is printed to the console that server successfully stopped. - However; the WebViews
stopLoading()command is not triggered at the native side — not until the app is brought back to the foreground again, immediately after which I capture by the debugger that it has been triggered.
My expectation here, especially considering that TurboModule has no problem to trigger native call, and deliver backward event to JS immediately after the app state changed to background, that the same should work for Fabric components; however, it is not the case. What do you think? Is it a bug? Or a limitation of the current new arch implementation for components? Or is it RN WebView's code uses a stale approach to operate native commands (though, it seems it follows what is currently documented here)?
Steps to reproduce
N/A
React Native Version
0.74.2
Affected Platforms
Runtime - Android
Areas
Other (please specify)
Output of npx react-native info
N/A
Stacktrace or Logs
N/A
Reproducer
https://github.com/birdofpreyru/issue-45017
Screenshots and Videos
No response
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
从链接的 reproducer(https://github.com/birdofpreyru/issue-45017)开始,跟踪 Fabric NativeCommands、TurboModule 调用和 AppState 更改的 Android 交付路径。将 WebView 的 stopLoading() 调用与服务器的 stop() 调用进行比较;当顺序或阻塞行为得到解释,并且预期行为得到明确确定时,即表示完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- android, javascript, react-native
- 领域
- mobile-dev
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 新手友好度
- 28/100