react-navigation / react-navigation/react-navigation.github.io
The documentation on type scripting nested navigation is unclear
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- JavaScript
- Sterne
- 324
- Forks
- 2k
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.
Beschreibung
Current Behavior
- What code are you running and what is happening?
- Include a screenshot or video if it makes sense.
I'm trying to setup typescript for navigating into a nested navigator. From reading the doc, this was my attempt (which I'm assuming is wrong. It gives me''Create Conversation modal'' is referenced directly or indirectly in its own type annotation.ts(2502.
export type RootStackParamList = {
Home: undefined;
SignInUpTunnel: undefined;
'Create Conversation modal': NavigatorScreenParams<EditConversationModalNavigatorParamList>; <==== typescript error here
};
...
return
<AuthenticatedUserProvider>
<Stack.Navigator screenOptions={{ headerShown: false }} mode="modal">
<Stack.Screen name="Home" component={HomeDrawerNavigator} />
<Stack.Screen name="Create Conversation modal" component={EditConversationModalNavigator} />
</Stack.Navigator>
</AuthenticatedUserProvider>
...
export type EditConversationModalNavigatorParamList = RootStackParamList & {
'Create conversation': { userToInvite: UserConversationStatusCellData | null };
};
...
navigation.navigate('Create Conversation modal', { screen: 'Create conversation', params: { userToInvite } });
Unfortunately, the documentation on this topic is very thin: https://reactnavigation.org/docs/typescript#type-checking-screens-and-params-in-nested-navigator.
Also, the documentation uses a different navigation structure than the documentation for nesting navigators. making it hard to know where to actually put the NavigatorScreenParams and what paramList to give it.
Expected Behavior
I would expect the documentation for the typescripting of a nested navigator to include a full example (with the root navigator and nested navigator) and I would expect it to use the same navigators as the documentation to nest navigator.
How to reproduce
- You must provide a way to reproduce the problem. If you are having an issue with your machine or build tools, the issue belongs on another repository as that is outside of the scope of React Navigation.
- Either re-create the bug on Snack or link to a GitHub repository with code that reproduces the bug.
- Explain how to run the example app and any steps that we need to take to reproduce the issue from the example app.
- Keep the repro code as simple as possible, with the minimum amount of code required to repro the issue.
- Before reporting an issue, make sure you are on the latest version of the package.
Your Environment
| software | version |
|---|---|
| typescript 4.0.7 | |
| @react-navigation/native 5.9.3 | |
| react-native | |
| expo 40 | |
| node 14.6.0 | |
| npm or yarn 1.22.10 |
Beitragsleitfaden
Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Beginne mit der TypeScript-Seite zur verschachtelten Navigation und der separaten Dokumentation zur Verschachtelung von Navigatoren, die im Issue verlinkt ist. Vergleiche deren Navigator-Strukturen und verwende die angegebene RootStackParamList und EditConversationModalNavigatorParamList als Beispielkontext. Als erledigt gilt die Aufgabe, wenn die TypeScript-Seite ein vollständiges, passendes Beispiel für den Root-Navigator und den verschachtelten Navigator enthält, das erklärt, wo NavigatorScreenParams hingehört.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- react-native, typescript
- Bereich
- documentation
- Issue-Typ
- Dokumentation
- Schwierigkeit
- 3/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 1-2 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Klar beschrieben
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100