Fixed-size, multi-type sequence
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 1.8k
- 派生
- 302
- 平均合并
- 23 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 8
描述
This came up in python/typeshed#2287, but I have encountered the same problem myself. As far as I know, currently the only way to annotate a multi-type, fixed length sequence is using Tuple. But for input types this is often too strict:
def foo(x: Tuple[int, str]) -> None:
a, b = x
def bar(x: Tuple[int, str]) -> None:
a = x[0]
b = x[1]
The implementations accept any iterable (first case) or sequence (second case) that yield two values:
class Iter:
def __iter__(self):
yield 1
yield ""
foo((1, ""))
foo([1, ""])
foo(Iter())
bar((1, ""))
bar([1, ""])
It would be useful to have a way to annotate this. Of course type checkers would still need to reject generic cases like this:
def foo(x: TupleLike[str, str]): ...
x: List[str] = ...
foo(x)
But it could allow some things that are not possible at the moment, and opens the possibility for future improvements.
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
先阅读 python/typeshed#2287 以及此 issue 中的示例,然后查看 typing 当前如何表示元组、可迭代对象和序列。该 issue 没有指定实现文件或测试;要视为完成,需要就一种既支持所述输入、又保留有用类型检查限制的注解设计达成一致。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- devtools
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 新手友好度
- 25/100