Proposal: Support Unpacked `TypeVarTuple` and `tuple` in `Concatenate`
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 1.8k
- Fork
- 302
- Merge medio
- 23h
- PR unite (30g)
- 8
Descrizione
Abstract
PEP 612 introduced ParamSpec and Concatenate to prepend fixed positional parameters to a callable's signature. PEP 646 introduced TypeVarTuple for variadic positional typing in Callable[[*Ts], R]. Because the two PEPs were developed independently, the typing specification does not allow unpacked types (*Ts or *tuple[...]) inside Concatenate.
This proposal extends Concatenate to accept unpack_expressions in its prefix, enabling Callable[Concatenate[*Ts, P], R].
Motivation
Higher-order abstractions like partial application helpers and execution wrappers need to capture an arbitrary number of leading positional arguments while preserving the remaining signature (keyword-only params, defaults, **kwargs) via ParamSpec. Today, this requires repetitive overload ladders:
from typing import Any, Callable, Concatenate, overload
class Wrapper[**P, R]:
@overload
def __init__(self, fn: Callable[P, R]) -> None: ...
@overload
def __init__[G1](
self,
fn: Callable[Concatenate[G1, P], R],
__g1: G1,
/,
) -> None: ...
@overload
def __init__[G1, G2](
self,
fn: Callable[Concatenate[G1, G2, P], R],
__g1: G1,
__g2: G2,
/,
) -> None: ...
# Must repeat up to arbitrary maximum arity...
def __init__(self, fn: Callable[..., R], *args: Any) -> None:
self._fn = fn
self._args = args
def __call__(self, *args: P.args, **kwargs: P.kwargs) -> R:
return self._fn(*self._args, *args, **kwargs)
With this proposal, the entire ladder collapses to a single generic signature:
from __future__ import annotations
from typing import Callable, Concatenate
class Wrapper[**P, R, *Ts]:
def __init__(self, fn: Callable[Concatenate[*Ts, P], R], *args: *Ts) -> None:
self._fn = fn
self._args = args
def __call__(self, *args: P.args, **kwargs: P.kwargs) -> R:
return self._fn(*self._args, *args, **kwargs)
def f(a: str, b: int, *, flag: bool = False, x: float) -> bool: ...
# Ts = () -> P = (a: str, b: int, *, flag: bool = ..., x: float)
w0 = Wrapper(f)
r0 = w0("hello", 42, x=3.14, flag=True) # type: bool
# Ts = (str,) -> P = (b: int, *, flag: bool = ..., x: float)
w1 = Wrapper(f, "hello")
r1 = w1(42, x=3.14) # type: bool
# Ts = (str, int) -> P = (*, flag: bool = ..., x: float)
w2 = Wrapper(f, "hello", 42)
r2 = w2(x=3.14) # type: bool
Specification
Grammar
Update the Concatenate grammar in the typing specification from:
concatenate ::= "Concatenate" "[" type_expression ("," type_expression)* "," parameter_specification_variable "]"
to:
concatenate_prefix_item ::= type_expression | unpack_expression
concatenate ::= "Concatenate" "[" concatenate_prefix_item ("," concatenate_prefix_item)* "," parameter_specification_variable "]"
Semantics
Expansion follows existing PEP 646 semantics: when *Ts is bound to tuple[T1, T2, ..., Tn], Concatenate[*Ts, P] is equivalent to Concatenate[T1, T2, ..., Tn, P]. When *Ts is bound to tuple[()], Concatenate[*Ts, P] simplifies to P. Individual type expressions and unpack expressions may be freely combined in the prefix (e.g. Concatenate[LeadingArg, *Ts, P]).
Open Question: Splitting Boundary
The core design question is: how does a type checker determine the split between the prefix and ParamSpec P?
When the prefix length is statically known, splitting is unambiguous. This covers concrete bounded tuples (Concatenate[*tuple[int, str], P] — always length 2) and value-anchored TypeVarTuples where a companion *args: *Ts pins the length at the call site (the Wrapper example above). These are the primary use cases.
Ambiguity arises when the prefix length is not statically determined:
Case A — Unanchored *Ts (no companion *args: *Ts):
class TaskRunner[**P, R, *Ts]:
def __init__(self, fn: Callable[Concatenate[*Ts, P], R]) -> None: ...
def compute(user_id: int, query: str, *, timeout: float = 5.0) -> bool: ...
# How many positional params should *Ts capture vs. leave in P?
task = TaskRunner(compute)
Case B — Unbounded tuple (*tuple[T, ...]):
def strip_leading_ints[**P, R](
fn: Callable[Concatenate[*tuple[int, ...], P], R]
) -> Callable[P, R]: ...
def example(x: int, y: int, z: int, *, flag: bool = False) -> None: ...
# *tuple[int, ...] could match 0, 1, 2, or 3 leading int parameters.
wrapped = strip_leading_ints(example)
Options:
-
Option 1 — Greedy prefix: The prefix consumes all matching positional-capable parameters. In Case A,
*Ts = (int, str)andP = (*, timeout: float = 5.0). In Case B, all 3 ints are consumed, leavingP = (*, flag: bool = False). -
Option 2 — Restrict to fixed-length prefixes initially: Require the prefix length to be statically determined (concrete bounded tuples, companion
*args: *Ts, or explicit specialization). Reject unanchored/unbounded prefixes as ambiguous and defer them to a future extension.
Guida per i contributori
Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia dalla sezione collegata della specifica di typing relativa alle posizioni d’uso valide, quindi confronta la grammatica e la semantica proposte con il comportamento di PEP 646 e PEP 612 descritto qui. Il lavoro è completato quando è stata selezionata e documentata una regola per suddividere il prefisso spacchettato di ParamSpec P, inclusi i casi non ancorato e non vincolato.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Stack tecnologico
- python
- Ambito
- devtools, documentation
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Stato di attività
- Tranquilla
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100