Proposal: Support Unpacked `TypeVarTuple` and `tuple` in `Concatenate`
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Python
- Sterne
- 1.8k
- Forks
- 302
- Ø Merge
- 23 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 8
Beschreibung
Abstract
PEP 612 introduced ParamSpec and Concatenate to prepend fixed positional parameters to a callable's signature. PEP 646 introduced TypeVarTuple for variadic positional typing in Callable[[*Ts], R]. Because the two PEPs were developed independently, the typing specification does not allow unpacked types (*Ts or *tuple[...]) inside Concatenate.
This proposal extends Concatenate to accept unpack_expressions in its prefix, enabling Callable[Concatenate[*Ts, P], R].
Motivation
Higher-order abstractions like partial application helpers and execution wrappers need to capture an arbitrary number of leading positional arguments while preserving the remaining signature (keyword-only params, defaults, **kwargs) via ParamSpec. Today, this requires repetitive overload ladders:
from typing import Any, Callable, Concatenate, overload
class Wrapper[**P, R]:
@overload
def __init__(self, fn: Callable[P, R]) -> None: ...
@overload
def __init__[G1](
self,
fn: Callable[Concatenate[G1, P], R],
__g1: G1,
/,
) -> None: ...
@overload
def __init__[G1, G2](
self,
fn: Callable[Concatenate[G1, G2, P], R],
__g1: G1,
__g2: G2,
/,
) -> None: ...
# Must repeat up to arbitrary maximum arity...
def __init__(self, fn: Callable[..., R], *args: Any) -> None:
self._fn = fn
self._args = args
def __call__(self, *args: P.args, **kwargs: P.kwargs) -> R:
return self._fn(*self._args, *args, **kwargs)
With this proposal, the entire ladder collapses to a single generic signature:
from __future__ import annotations
from typing import Callable, Concatenate
class Wrapper[**P, R, *Ts]:
def __init__(self, fn: Callable[Concatenate[*Ts, P], R], *args: *Ts) -> None:
self._fn = fn
self._args = args
def __call__(self, *args: P.args, **kwargs: P.kwargs) -> R:
return self._fn(*self._args, *args, **kwargs)
def f(a: str, b: int, *, flag: bool = False, x: float) -> bool: ...
# Ts = () -> P = (a: str, b: int, *, flag: bool = ..., x: float)
w0 = Wrapper(f)
r0 = w0("hello", 42, x=3.14, flag=True) # type: bool
# Ts = (str,) -> P = (b: int, *, flag: bool = ..., x: float)
w1 = Wrapper(f, "hello")
r1 = w1(42, x=3.14) # type: bool
# Ts = (str, int) -> P = (*, flag: bool = ..., x: float)
w2 = Wrapper(f, "hello", 42)
r2 = w2(x=3.14) # type: bool
Specification
Grammar
Update the Concatenate grammar in the typing specification from:
concatenate ::= "Concatenate" "[" type_expression ("," type_expression)* "," parameter_specification_variable "]"
to:
concatenate_prefix_item ::= type_expression | unpack_expression
concatenate ::= "Concatenate" "[" concatenate_prefix_item ("," concatenate_prefix_item)* "," parameter_specification_variable "]"
Semantics
Expansion follows existing PEP 646 semantics: when *Ts is bound to tuple[T1, T2, ..., Tn], Concatenate[*Ts, P] is equivalent to Concatenate[T1, T2, ..., Tn, P]. When *Ts is bound to tuple[()], Concatenate[*Ts, P] simplifies to P. Individual type expressions and unpack expressions may be freely combined in the prefix (e.g. Concatenate[LeadingArg, *Ts, P]).
Open Question: Splitting Boundary
The core design question is: how does a type checker determine the split between the prefix and ParamSpec P?
When the prefix length is statically known, splitting is unambiguous. This covers concrete bounded tuples (Concatenate[*tuple[int, str], P] — always length 2) and value-anchored TypeVarTuples where a companion *args: *Ts pins the length at the call site (the Wrapper example above). These are the primary use cases.
Ambiguity arises when the prefix length is not statically determined:
Case A — Unanchored *Ts (no companion *args: *Ts):
class TaskRunner[**P, R, *Ts]:
def __init__(self, fn: Callable[Concatenate[*Ts, P], R]) -> None: ...
def compute(user_id: int, query: str, *, timeout: float = 5.0) -> bool: ...
# How many positional params should *Ts capture vs. leave in P?
task = TaskRunner(compute)
Case B — Unbounded tuple (*tuple[T, ...]):
def strip_leading_ints[**P, R](
fn: Callable[Concatenate[*tuple[int, ...], P], R]
) -> Callable[P, R]: ...
def example(x: int, y: int, z: int, *, flag: bool = False) -> None: ...
# *tuple[int, ...] could match 0, 1, 2, or 3 leading int parameters.
wrapped = strip_leading_ints(example)
Options:
-
Option 1 — Greedy prefix: The prefix consumes all matching positional-capable parameters. In Case A,
*Ts = (int, str)andP = (*, timeout: float = 5.0). In Case B, all 3 ints are consumed, leavingP = (*, flag: bool = False). -
Option 2 — Restrict to fixed-length prefixes initially: Require the prefix length to be statically determined (concrete bounded tuples, companion
*args: *Ts, or explicit specialization). Reject unanchored/unbounded prefixes as ambiguous and defer them to a future extension.
Beitragsleitfaden
Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Beginne mit dem verlinkten Abschnitt der Typing-Spezifikation zu gültigen Verwendungsstellen und vergleiche dann die vorgeschlagene Grammatik und Semantik mit dem hier beschriebenen Verhalten von PEP 646 und PEP 612. Erledigt ist die Aufgabe, wenn eine Regel zum Aufteilen des entpackten Präfixes von ParamSpec P ausgewählt und dokumentiert ist, einschließlich der nicht verankerten und unbeschränkten Fälle.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- python
- Bereich
- devtools, documentation
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Ruhig
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100