Ability to use Callable type alias when annotating functions

Hello. I would like to revive the discussion about Callable type aliases. The original discussion is here, and the related discussion about @declared_type is here and here.

The original thread contains a great example of the problem and a proposed solution:

from typing import Callable
import math

ActivationFunction = Callable[[float], float]

sigmoid: ActivationFunction
def sigmoid(x):
     return 1 / (1 + math.exp(-x))

relu: ActivationFunction
def relu(x):
     return max(0, x)

Another prosed solution is to use the @declared_type decorator:

@declared_type(ActivationFunction)
def sigmoid(x):
     return 1 / (1 + math.exp(-x))

@declared_type(ActivationFunction)
def relu(x):
     return max(0, x)

Currently, this can be done with Protocols, but it's too verbose:

from typing import Protocol
import math

class ActivationFunction(Protocol):
    def __call__(self, x: float) -> float:
        ...

class Sigmoid(ActivationFunction):
    def __call__(self, x: float) -> float:
        return 1 / (1 + math.exp(-x))

class Relu(ActivationFunction):
    def __call__(self, x: float) -> float:
        return max(0, x)

sigmoid = Sigmoid()
relu = Relu()

print(sigmoid(0.5))
print(relu(0.5))

If the function is a single expression, it can be done very nicely with lambdas:

from typing import Callable
import math

ActivationFunction = Callable[[float], float]

sigmoid: ActivationFunction = lambda x: 1 / (1 + math.exp(-x))
relu: ActivationFunction = lambda x: max(0, x)

print(sigmoid(0.5))
print(relu(0.5))

Here's the equivalent FSharp code, with the only difference being that FSharp supports multiline lambdas:

type ActivationFunction = float -> float

let sigmoid: ActivationFunction = fun x -> 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(-x))
let relu: ActivationFunction = fun x -> max 0.0 x

printfn "%f" (sigmoid 0.5)
printfn "%f" (relu 0.5)

I'm asking about this feature because I'm reading a book called Domain Modeling Made Functional by Scott Wlaschin. In this book, the author recommends modeling the domain with types, including function type aliases, and focusing on the implementation details later. Here's an example from Chapter 9:

I'd like to try a similar approach in Python. Has there been any further discussion about this topic, or is there a workaround I'm unaware of? Thank you!

首先阅读 issue 1641、2087 和 pull request 3291 中链接的讨论，然后将提出的 Callable 别名和 @declared_type 方案与此处展示的 Protocol 变通方案进行比较。完成标准是：为函数定义添加注解的行为已明确选择并获得接受，同时完成相应的实现和验证工作；此 issue 未指定文件或测试。