Type inference of generic types: no way to be warned about Generic[Any]
まだ誰も着手していません。
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 20.6k
- フォーク
- 3.3k
- PR マージ指標
- PR 指標を取得中
説明
Usage specs: mypy 0.720 on Python 3.7.3
Bug or feature request: Not really a bug, just a usability inconvenience and potential source of errors
Problem Description
Hello!
I've just realised that a certain way of type checking generic classes (even built-in ones like Sequence, List, Mapping...) can be very error-prone:
There's no way to be warned by mypy when inferring the type of a generic variable which has no explicit type parameter, e.g when inferring the Generic[Any] type through an isinstance(value, Generic) call.
This is error-prone due to the dynamic nature of Any, which allows a Generic[Any] to masquerade as a more specific generic type of the same kind: for instance, a Sequence[Any] variable can be assigned to a variable of Sequence[str] type.
I know that the disallow_any_generics option warns us when we define type hints for generic types with no type parameters: sequence:Sequence = ["hello"] would trigger an error from mypy.
What bothers me is that there is no way to be warned about it when the type is inferred by mypy through an isinstance call.
Minimal Example
Consider the function below, which is supposed to return a Sequence[str], but does not actually ensure that each item inside the sequence is a string.
# coding: utf-8
# mypy: warn_return_any
# mypy: disallow_any_expr
# mypy: disallow_any_generics
from typing import Sequence
def getStringSequence(value:object) -> Sequence[str]:
if isinstance(value, Sequence):
reveal_type(value) # Revealed type is Sequence[Any]
return value
raise TypeError
This example is successfully type checked by mypy, while I would expect it to trigger an error:
In the return statement, mypy allows me to return a Sequence[Any] from the function, when a Sequence[str] was expected instead.
I understand that this is due to the dynamic nature of Any, but given my use of the warn_return_any, disallow_any_expr and disallow_any_generics options, I would expect mypy to warn me about it.
Discussion
Not sure about which combination of these 3 options should trigger an error?
This is all highly debatable, but at a glance, I'd say that:
- When
warn_return_anyis True, mypy should warn us whenever we return aGeneric[Any], even if it is merely inferred and not explicitly typed through an hint. In the above code example, an error would be raised in the return statement. - When
warn_any_expris True, mypy should warn us whenever we use aGeneric[Any], even if it is merely inferred. I assume the error would be raised on the first statement to use the variable whose type was inferred. In the above example, an error would be raised in the return statement again. - Both of these behaviours should be enabled only when
disallow_any_genericsis True as well.
To provide more context, my use case is type checking arbitrary data structures loaded from declarative formats like JSON and YAML, hence my reliance on type inference over type hints.
I realise it's possible to correct this function's return statement easily: return tuple(item for item in value if isinstance(item, str))
But I still find the risk of accidentally having Any masquerade as a more specific type parameter fairly worrying, so it'd be great to have a way to be warned about it.
Thanks for reading, hope I was clear enough.
Many, many thanks for your collective hard work on mypy!
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
調査の方向性
issue の最小限の Python 例から始め、warn_return_any、disallow_any_expr、disallow_any_generics を使用して、そこで明らかになった Sequence[Any] 型を再現します。mypy がこれらのオプションに対して推論されたジェネリック型と診断をどのように処理するかを確認し、その後、return 文に対して意図された警告動作を定義してテストします。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- python
- 領域
- devtools
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 35/100