Allow `Final` in type arguments to avoid shadowing arguments - disallow reassignment of function parameters
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 20.6k
- Fork
- 3.3k
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Metriche PR in attesa
Descrizione
Feature
As proposed in https://github.com/wemake-services/wemake-python-styleguide/issues/2128, I am looking to find a way to disallow reassignment of function parameters. During the discussion, I discovered that Final was introduced in PEP 591 and seemed like a great solution but I ran into the limitation around function arguments:
Final can’t be used in annotations for function arguments:
https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/final_attrs.html#details-of-using-final
I was curious on why the limitation was there in the first place but all I could really find was from the PEP 591 PR on GitHub. And was unable to find the pre-discussion on the mailing list or that GitHub project.
Two more things worth mentioning in rejected ideas: [...]
- allow
Finalin function argument annotationsFor the second point, it would cause too much confusion with function not mutating the argument.
-- https://github.com/python/peps/pull/990#commitcomment-33164572
In mypy, I could find that Final was added in https://github.com/python/mypy/pull/5522 which mentions:
I don't allow
Finalin function argument types. One argument is simplicity, another is I didn't see many bugs related to shadowing an argument in function bodies, finally people might have quite different expectations for this. If people will ask, this would be easy to implement.
In a previous revision of the documentation, it mentioned this example:
Finalcan be only used as an outermost type in assignments, using it in
any other position is an error. In particular,Finalcan't be used in
annotations for function arguments because this may cause confusions about
what are the guarantees in this case:: List[Final[int]] = [] # Error! def fun(x: Final[List[int]]) -> None: # Error!
Pitch
Allow Final in type arguments.
Recently ran into a real-life bug because of accidentally re-assigning a function parameter, https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10439/files/a94217ee34840237867d037cf1133f3a9bf6b95a
Simplified reproduction case (original code):
def ensure_correct_context(event: EventBase, context: EventContext):
remote_auth_chain = get_event_auth(event)
for auth_event in remote_auth_chain:
# XXX: Problem is here!
# We are introducing a bug because `context` which corresponds to `event`
# is being re-assigned to the `context` for the `auth_event`
context = compute_event_context(auth_event)
persist_event(auth_event, context)
# logic for context_needs_updating
if context_needs_updating:
return compute_event_context(event)
return context
Fixed code:
def ensure_correct_context(event: EventBase, context: EventContext):
remote_auth_chain = get_event_auth(event)
for auth_event in remote_auth_chain:
auth_event_context = compute_event_context(auth_event)
persist_event(auth_event, auth_event_context)
# logic for context_needs_updating
if context_needs_updating:
return compute_event_context(event)
return context
Proposed mypy code that would trigger a violation for the bug to catch it in the first place when writing the original code:
def ensure_correct_context(event: EventBase, context: Final[EventContext]):
remote_auth_chain = get_event_auth(event)
for auth_event in remote_auth_chain:
# XXX: Violation shold trigger here!
# We are introducing a bug because `context` which corresponds to `event`
# is being re-assigned to the `context` for the `auth_event`
context = compute_event_context(auth_event)
persist_event(auth_event, context)
# logic for context_needs_updating
if context_needs_updating:
return compute_event_context(event)
return context
I am coming at this from a JavaScript background where ESlint has a no-param-reassign rule for JavaScript which disallows reassignment of function parameters.
Assignment to variables declared as function parameters can be misleading and lead to confusing behavior,
as modifying function parameters will also mutate the. Often, assignment to function parameters is unintended and indicative of a mistake or programmer error.argumentsobject
Why? Manipulating objects passed in as parameters can cause unwanted variable side effects in the original caller.
It's also about the clarity of mutating and reassigning - it's easier to understand functions when the arguments are static and constant throughout the life of the function.
https://github.com/eslint/website/issues/686#issuecomment-577419721
Related discussion, https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/5306
- shadowing
- masking
- overriding
- overwriting
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia leggendo la restrizione di PEP 591 e l’implementazione esistente di Final in mypy descritta in PR #5522. Esamina gli esempi collegati e la discussione sulle annotazioni degli argomenti delle funzioni e sulla semantica delle riassegnazioni. Il lavoro è completo quando è stato deciso un comportamento per Final nei parametri delle funzioni e le violazioni di riassegnazione vengono segnalate in modo coerente.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Stack tecnologico
- python
- Ambito
- tooling
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100