Allow `Final` in type arguments to avoid shadowing arguments - disallow reassignment of function parameters
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
- Langage dominant
- Python
- Étoiles
- 20.6k
- Forks
- 3.3k
- Métriques de merge des PR
- Métriques de PR en attente
Description
Feature
As proposed in https://github.com/wemake-services/wemake-python-styleguide/issues/2128, I am looking to find a way to disallow reassignment of function parameters. During the discussion, I discovered that Final was introduced in PEP 591 and seemed like a great solution but I ran into the limitation around function arguments:
Final can’t be used in annotations for function arguments:
https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/final_attrs.html#details-of-using-final
I was curious on why the limitation was there in the first place but all I could really find was from the PEP 591 PR on GitHub. And was unable to find the pre-discussion on the mailing list or that GitHub project.
Two more things worth mentioning in rejected ideas: [...]
- allow
Finalin function argument annotationsFor the second point, it would cause too much confusion with function not mutating the argument.
-- https://github.com/python/peps/pull/990#commitcomment-33164572
In mypy, I could find that Final was added in https://github.com/python/mypy/pull/5522 which mentions:
I don't allow
Finalin function argument types. One argument is simplicity, another is I didn't see many bugs related to shadowing an argument in function bodies, finally people might have quite different expectations for this. If people will ask, this would be easy to implement.
In a previous revision of the documentation, it mentioned this example:
Finalcan be only used as an outermost type in assignments, using it in
any other position is an error. In particular,Finalcan't be used in
annotations for function arguments because this may cause confusions about
what are the guarantees in this case:: List[Final[int]] = [] # Error! def fun(x: Final[List[int]]) -> None: # Error!
Pitch
Allow Final in type arguments.
Recently ran into a real-life bug because of accidentally re-assigning a function parameter, https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10439/files/a94217ee34840237867d037cf1133f3a9bf6b95a
Simplified reproduction case (original code):
def ensure_correct_context(event: EventBase, context: EventContext):
remote_auth_chain = get_event_auth(event)
for auth_event in remote_auth_chain:
# XXX: Problem is here!
# We are introducing a bug because `context` which corresponds to `event`
# is being re-assigned to the `context` for the `auth_event`
context = compute_event_context(auth_event)
persist_event(auth_event, context)
# logic for context_needs_updating
if context_needs_updating:
return compute_event_context(event)
return context
Fixed code:
def ensure_correct_context(event: EventBase, context: EventContext):
remote_auth_chain = get_event_auth(event)
for auth_event in remote_auth_chain:
auth_event_context = compute_event_context(auth_event)
persist_event(auth_event, auth_event_context)
# logic for context_needs_updating
if context_needs_updating:
return compute_event_context(event)
return context
Proposed mypy code that would trigger a violation for the bug to catch it in the first place when writing the original code:
def ensure_correct_context(event: EventBase, context: Final[EventContext]):
remote_auth_chain = get_event_auth(event)
for auth_event in remote_auth_chain:
# XXX: Violation shold trigger here!
# We are introducing a bug because `context` which corresponds to `event`
# is being re-assigned to the `context` for the `auth_event`
context = compute_event_context(auth_event)
persist_event(auth_event, context)
# logic for context_needs_updating
if context_needs_updating:
return compute_event_context(event)
return context
I am coming at this from a JavaScript background where ESlint has a no-param-reassign rule for JavaScript which disallows reassignment of function parameters.
Assignment to variables declared as function parameters can be misleading and lead to confusing behavior,
as modifying function parameters will also mutate the. Often, assignment to function parameters is unintended and indicative of a mistake or programmer error.argumentsobject
Why? Manipulating objects passed in as parameters can cause unwanted variable side effects in the original caller.
It's also about the clarity of mutating and reassigning - it's easier to understand functions when the arguments are static and constant throughout the life of the function.
https://github.com/eslint/website/issues/686#issuecomment-577419721
Related discussion, https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/5306
- shadowing
- masking
- overriding
- overwriting
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Piste de recherche
Commencez par lire la restriction de PEP 591 et l’implémentation existante de Final dans mypy décrite dans PR #5522. Examinez les exemples liés ainsi que la discussion sur les annotations des arguments de fonction et la sémantique des réaffectations. Le travail est considéré comme terminé lorsqu’un comportement est défini pour Final dans les paramètres de fonction et que les violations de réaffectation sont signalées de manière cohérente.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- python
- Domaine
- tooling
- Type d'issue
- Fonctionnalité
- Difficulté
- 5/5
- Temps estimé
- Plus d'une semaine
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Accessibilité débutants
- 35/100