multiprocessing.Pool gets stuck indefinitely when the child process is killed manually
まだ誰も着手していません。
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 77.2k
- フォーク
- 36k
- PR マージ指標
- PR 指標を取得中
説明
Bug report
When I use multiprocessing.Pool and let processes=1 to execute the task, if I manually kill the child process in the background, the task will not be executed, and the new child process seems to be waiting indefinitely and cannot be terminated.
Here is the example I tested:
import logging
import multiprocessing
import platform
import time
from multiprocessing import Pool
multiprocessing.log_to_stderr().setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
def print_some(i):
print("Current process name is %s" % multiprocessing.current_process())
print("--------------"+str(i)+"--------------")
return "return "+str(i)
def callback_func(n):
print (n)
if __name__ == "__main__":
print(platform.python_version())
multiprocessing.set_start_method('fork')
p = Pool(1)
i = 0
print(p._pool[0].pid)
while i < 6:
p.apply_async(print_some, (i, ), callback=callback_func)
time.sleep(3)
i = i+1
print("end")
print(p._pool[0].pid)
p.terminate()
print("close")
and the output is(I manually kill the process 30995):
3.8.2
[DEBUG/MainProcess] created semlock with handle 6
[DEBUG/MainProcess] created semlock with handle 7
[DEBUG/MainProcess] created semlock with handle 10
[DEBUG/MainProcess] created semlock with handle 11
[DEBUG/MainProcess] created semlock with handle 14
[DEBUG/MainProcess] created semlock with handle 15
[DEBUG/MainProcess] added worker
[INFO/ForkPoolWorker-1] child process calling self.run()
30995
Current process name is <ForkProcess name='ForkPoolWorker-1' parent=30994 started daemon>
--------------0--------------
return 0
Current process name is <ForkProcess name='ForkPoolWorker-1' parent=30994 started daemon>
--------------1--------------
return 1
Current process name is <ForkProcess name='ForkPoolWorker-1' parent=30994 started daemon>
--------------2--------------
return 2
Current process name is <ForkProcess name='ForkPoolWorker-1' parent=30994 started daemon>
--------------3--------------
return 3
[DEBUG/MainProcess] cleaning up worker 0
[DEBUG/MainProcess] added worker
[INFO/ForkPoolWorker-2] child process calling self.run()
[DEBUG/MainProcess] terminating pool
[DEBUG/MainProcess] finalizing pool
[DEBUG/MainProcess] helping task handler/workers to finish
[DEBUG/MainProcess] removing tasks from inqueue until task handler finished
[DEBUG/MainProcess] worker handler exiting
[DEBUG/MainProcess] task handler got sentinel
[DEBUG/MainProcess] task handler sending sentinel to result handler
[DEBUG/MainProcess] task handler sending sentinel to workers
[DEBUG/MainProcess] task handler exiting
[DEBUG/MainProcess] result handler got sentinel
end
31000
From the output, when I kill the child process, multiprocessing.Pool does start a new process, but the task cannot continue, and terminate() seems to be stuck somewhere, because my main process is not over, been waiting.
During the running process of the service, the process of crashing is unpredictable, so I did such a test: when using multi-process, what effect will the child process crash have on the program. Finally found such a problem.
Your environment
- CPython versions tested on: Python3.8.2
- Operating system and architecture:MacOS10.15.7 or ubuntu16.0.4
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
調査の方向性
macOS または Ubuntu 上で報告された Python 3.8.2 環境を使用し、まず再現コードで示されている multiprocessing.Pool の動作から始めます。worker を強制終了しながら例を再実行し、その後、worker の置き換えと terminate() の処理を追跡します。worker が強制終了された後もキューに入ったタスクを続行でき、プールの終了処理が無期限に待機しなければ完了です。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- python
- 領域
- operating-systems
- issue の種類
- バグ
- 難易度
- 4/5
- 見積もり時間
- 3〜5日
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 35/100