Emscripten: a signal written while the signal buffer is being cleared is lost
Chưa có ai nhận issue này.
- Ngôn ngữ chính
- Python
- Star
- 77.2k
- Fork
- 35.9k
- Chỉ số merge pull request
- Chỉ số pull request đang chờ
Mô tả
Bug report
Bug description:
_Py_CheckEmscriptenSignals_Helper in Python/emscripten_signal.c reads the signal buffer and then clears
it as two separate operations:
let result = Module.Py_EmscriptenSignalBuffer[0];
Module.Py_EmscriptenSignalBuffer[0] = 0;
return result;
The buffer is a SharedArrayBuffer written by another thread (see the comment at the top of the file, and
Pyodide's setInterruptBuffer). If that thread stores a signal number after the read and before the clear,
the number is overwritten with 0 and PyErr_SetInterruptEx() is never called for it. Nothing is left
pending, so the signal is not delivered at all.
The helper is called from _PyErr_CheckSignalsTstate() and, every 50th time, from check_periodics() in the
eval loop, so a Python loop calls it constantly. On a busy machine this shows up as a KeyboardInterrupt or
a SIGTERM handler that occasionally never runs.
Atomics.exchange() reads the value and stores 0 in one operation:
return Atomics.exchange(Module.Py_EmscriptenSignalBuffer, 0, 0);
It also accepts a non-shared Uint8Array or Int32Array, so embedders that pass one are unaffected.
The race, reproduced without building CPython (node race.mjs):
import { Worker } from 'node:worker_threads';
const RAISER = `
const { workerData } = require('node:worker_threads');
const cell = new Uint8Array(workerData.cell);
const control = new Int32Array(workerData.control);
let seed = 1;
while (control[0] < workerData.count && control[1] === 0) {
if (Atomics.load(cell, 0) !== 0) continue;
seed = (seed * 1103515245 + 12345) & 0x7fffffff;
for (let spin = seed % 64; spin > 0; spin--);
if (Atomics.compareExchange(cell, 0, 0, 2) === 0) Atomics.add(control, 0, 1);
}
Atomics.store(control, 2, 1);
`;
const readThenClear = (buf) => { const result = buf[0]; buf[0] = 0; return result; };
const exchange = (buf) => Atomics.exchange(buf, 0, 0);
async function race(name, take, count = 200000) {
const cell = new Uint8Array(new SharedArrayBuffer(1));
const control = new Int32Array(new SharedArrayBuffer(12));
const worker = new Worker(RAISER, { eval: true, workerData: { cell: cell.buffer, control: control.buffer, count } });
await new Promise((resolve) => worker.once('online', resolve));
let taken = 0;
for (const deadline = Date.now() + 10000; taken < count && Date.now() < deadline;) {
if (take(cell) !== 0) taken++;
}
Atomics.store(control, 1, 1);
while (Atomics.load(control, 2) === 0) Atomics.wait(control, 2, 0, 50);
await worker.terminate();
if (take(cell) !== 0) taken++;
const raised = Atomics.load(control, 0);
console.log(`${name}: raised ${raised}, taken ${taken}, lost ${raised - taken}`);
}
await race('read, then clear', readThenClear);
await race('Atomics.exchange', exchange);
The raiser only writes when the cell is empty, so every loss is a signal that was never delivered, not two
signals merged into one. Two runs on Node.js 24.18.0:
read, then clear: raised 200000, taken 192995, lost 7005
Atomics.exchange: raised 200000, taken 200000, lost 0
read, then clear: raised 200000, taken 198335, lost 1665
Atomics.exchange: raised 200000, taken 200000, lost 0
The same loss through an interpreter (Pyodide 314.0.5, CPython 3.14.2)
Each SIGUSR1 waits for the handler's acknowledgement before the next is sent, so a missing acknowledgement
is a lost signal. npm install pyodide@314.0.5 && node repro-pyodide.mjs:
import { Worker } from 'node:worker_threads';
import { loadPyodide } from 'pyodide';
const COUNT = 5000;
const py = await loadPyodide();
const cell = new Uint8Array(new SharedArrayBuffer(1));
const control = new Int32Array(new SharedArrayBuffer(20));
py.setInterruptBuffer(cell);
globalThis.acked = () => { Atomics.add(control, 3, 1); Atomics.notify(control, 3); };
py.runPython(`
import signal
from js import acked
got = 0
def handler(signum, frame):
global got
got += 1
acked()
signal.signal(signal.SIGUSR1, handler)
`);
const worker = new Worker(`
const { workerData } = require('node:worker_threads');
const cell = new Uint8Array(workerData.cell);
const control = new Int32Array(workerData.control);
let seed = 1;
while (control[0] < workerData.count) {
if (Atomics.load(cell, 0) !== 0) continue;
seed = (seed * 1103515245 + 12345) & 0x7fffffff;
for (let spin = seed % 32768; spin > 0; spin--);
if (Atomics.compareExchange(cell, 0, 0, 10) !== 0) continue;
const raised = Atomics.add(control, 0, 1) + 1;
const until = Date.now() + 3000;
while (Atomics.load(control, 3) < raised && Date.now() < until) Atomics.wait(control, 3, Atomics.load(control, 3), 50);
if (Atomics.load(control, 3) < raised) { Atomics.store(control, 4, raised); break; }
}
`, { eval: true, workerData: { cell: cell.buffer, control: control.buffer, count: COUNT } });
await new Promise((resolve) => worker.once('online', resolve));
const got = py.runPython(`
import time
end = time.monotonic() + 15
while got < ${COUNT} and time.monotonic() < end:
pass
got`);
await worker.terminate();
const lost = Atomics.load(control, 4);
console.log(lost ? `signal ${lost} was raised and never handled (handler ran ${got} times)` : `all ${got} signals handled`);
process.exit(0);
Three runs:
signal 1569 was raised and never handled (handler ran 1568 times)
signal 287 was raised and never handled (handler ran 286 times)
signal 125 was raised and never handled (handler ran 124 times)
The helper dates from bpo-47176. It is the same on main, 3.15, 3.14 and 3.13.
CPython versions tested on:
3.14
Operating systems tested on:
Other
Linked PRs
- gh-157553
Hướng dẫn đóng góp
Bắt đầu từ đâu
- Đọc hết issue, rồi đọc hướng dẫn đóng góp của dự án.
- Bình luận trên issue rằng bạn sẽ nhận — tránh hai người làm cùng một việc.
- Fork repository và làm thay đổi trên một nhánh.
- Mở pull request có tham chiếu số hiệu của issue.
Hướng nghiên cứu
Bắt đầu trong Python/emscripten_signal.c tại _Py_CheckEmscriptenSignals_Helper, sau đó lần theo các caller của nó trong _PyErr_CheckSignalsTstate() và check_periodics(). So sánh read-and-clear race đã được báo cáo với hành vi của Atomics.exchange và chạy bản tái hiện race Node.js được cung cấp; hoàn tất nghĩa là các signal đồng thời không bị mất. Một PR được liên kết, gh-157553, cho biết công việc đã đang được thực hiện.
Do mô hình lập chỉ mục viết ra từ nội dung của issue.
Đánh giá
- Công nghệ
- c, javascript, python
- Lĩnh vực
- operating-systems
- Loại issue
- Lỗi
- Độ khó
- 2/5
- Thời gian dự kiến
- 1-3 giờ
- Mức độ hoạt động
- Đình trệ
- Độ rõ ràng
- Đặc tả rõ ràng
- Mức phù hợp với người mới
- 35/100