`CALL_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR_*` misses for inherited built-in methods on subclass instances
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
- Langage dominant
- Python
- Étoiles
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 35.9k
- Métriques de merge des PR
- Métriques de PR en attente
Description
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
While looking at the guards used by the CALL_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR_* specializations, I noticed that inherited built-in methods on subclass instances can be specialized, but then fail the runtime guard.
Problem
The affected specializations appear to be:
CALL_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR_NOARGSCALL_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR_OCALL_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR_FASTCALL_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR_FAST_WITH_KEYWORDS
For example:
class MyList(list):
pass
def count_one(values):
return values.count(1)
After warmup, the call in count_one() specializes to CALL_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR_O. However, when the specialized instruction runs with a MyList instance, its guard fails and execution leaves the fast path.
specialize_method_descriptor() selects a CALL_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR_* instructions, and it does not require the receiver to have an exact type:
list instance → CALL_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR_O
MyList instance → CALL_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR_O
However, the runtime guard is stricter. For example, _GUARD_CALLABLE_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR_O contains:
EXIT_IF(!Py_IS_TYPE(self, method->d_common.d_type));
For an inherited list method called on MyList, method->d_common.d_type is list, so this exact type check fails.
As a result, the exact list receiver reaches the fast path, while the subclass receiver repeatedly misses the runtime guard:
list instance → guard succeeds → _CALL_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR_O_INLINE
MyList instance → guard fails → exit/fallback
There is already a related test (test_call_list_append) which expects a list subclass inheriting list.append to specialize to CALL_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR_O:
class MyList(list): pass
my_list_append(MyList())
self.assert_specialized(my_list_append, "CALL_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR_O")
This test appears to expect CALL_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR_O to handle the subclass case. However, the current exact type guard rejects the subclass receiver every time. As a result, CALL_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR_O may be installed, but its method-descriptor fast path can never be reached for this case.
Suggested fix
I suggest allowing the runtime guards to accept subclass instances as well:
- EXIT_IF(!Py_IS_TYPE(self, method->d_common.d_type));
+ EXIT_IF(!PyObject_TypeCheck(self, method->d_common.d_type));
But, I'm not sure whether relaxing these guards would affect any assumptions elsewhere in the interpreter.
If not, I would be happy to prepare a PR updating the four guards and adding regression tests that verify the fast path is actually executed.
Versions
CPython 3.16.0a0, Ubuntu 24.04, gcc 13.3.0
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
No response given
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Piste de recherche
Commencez dans Python/specialize.c, au niveau de specialize_method_descriptor(), et dans Python/bytecodes.c, au niveau des quatre gardes GUARD_CALLABLE_METHOD_DESCRIPTOR*. Examinez Lib/test/test_opcache.py, en particulier test_call_list_append, et exécutez les tests opcache pertinents. C’est terminé lorsque les méthodes intégrées héritées sur des instances de sous-classes passent la garde d’exécution et empruntent la voie rapide spécialisée prévue.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- c, python
- Domaine
- backend, performance
- Type d'issue
- Bug
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 3-5 jours
- Activité
- Calme
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Accessibilité débutants
- 58/100